Captura de video del primer ministro israelí, Benjamín Netanyahu, en declaraciones este domingo a un seleccionado grupo de periodistas en una visita con grandes medidas de seguridad a Arad, localidad del sur de Israel que este sábado noche sufrió un impacto de un misil iraní que dejó más de 60 heridos, entre ellos 10 graves, donde afirmó que "es hora de que los líderes del resto de los países se sumen" a la ofensiva de Israel y Estados Unidos contra Irán. (Foto: EFE/Oficina del Primer Ministro de Israel)

It appears that no one in the administration in Washington has a clear grasp of the true cost of this war. Nor is there any realistic endgame—something that should have been clearly defined before the bombing ever began.

It is increasingly evident to many observers that this attack was largely driven by Israel, which persuaded the United States to go along with it under the belief that it would be a swift and simple operation. The assumption seemed to be that, after the first bombs fell, Iranians would flood the streets and remove what remains of their government.

That, clearly, has not happened.

While there are numerous groups inside Iran that oppose the current leadership, it should not be assumed that they support U.S. or Israeli intervention. Opposition to a government does not automatically translate into support for foreign military action.

As of today, no clear justification has been presented for why Iran was bombed at this moment. President Trump initially claimed the goal was to eliminate Iran’s Islamic leadership and stated that he would personally name the country’s new leaders.

When asked how long the United States would remain in the war, Trump once said, “when Israel tells us,” and at other times claimed he would simply “feel it in his bones” when it was time to stop.

Any competent military planner could have outlined a more coherent strategy for the Department of Defense than the one currently unfolding.

The Strait of Hormuz should have been a central consideration from the beginning. Ensuring it remained open should have been addressed before the first bomb was dropped, not after.

Current estimates suggest the war is costing more than one billion dollars per day, and that figure includes only the cost of munitions. It does not account for personnel hours, the loss of aircraft, the destruction of military facilities, the evacuation of embassy staff, or the removal of American civilians from the region.

If all these costs were placed on a single spreadsheet, even the most ardent MAGA supporter would struggle to justify the expense—especially given the economic pressures already facing millions of Americans.

Some estimates suggest total costs may already be approaching $100 billion.

All the bombs being used by Israel are supplied by the United States, and requests for additional weapons are inevitable. Those costs, too, must be added to the total.

Beyond direct military spending, the war has had a significant impact on global oil prices, driving up the cost of gasoline, fertilizer, and countless oil‑dependent goods. These increases ripple through the economy and are ultimately paid by consumers.

Trump has demanded that other nations help secure oil shipments while simultaneously declaring that the U.S. has already “won”—yet he continues to call for “more winning,” without ever defining what victory actually looks like.

Meanwhile, the president’s supposed global allies—Russia, China, and North Korea—have instead aligned themselves with Iran, providing support and intelligence that helps track American forces.

Some within the administration appear to believe that once the bombing stops, everything will simply fall back into place. History suggests otherwise.

Even optimistic projections indicate it could take 18 to 24 months to return to anything resembling normalcy.

There are rumors that, through back channels, officials are searching for an off‑ramp that includes a ceasefire. Iran, however, has reportedly made it clear that any ceasefire without reparations is unacceptable.

At the same time, many countries are forging new economic and trade agreements that exclude the United States. These deals could damage American manufacturing and agriculture for years as lost markets are difficult—if not impossible—to recover.

America’s global reputation has suffered severe damage. As usual, the consequences will not be borne by politicians, but by ordinary people—those who may lose jobs, homes, and opportunities for their children, along with the stability of their communities.

History shows that the true costs of war extend far beyond the battlefield. After conflicts in Vietnam and the Middle East, long‑term expenses—such as healthcare for veterans and the rebuilding of destroyed infrastructure—were rarely fully accounted for. The psychological toll is even harder to measure, with high rates of PTSD affecting not only combatants but millions of children across all countries involved.

Most Americans have never experienced their homes being bombed, their families killed, or their loved ones severely injured. They have never had to flee in the middle of the night as buildings collapsed around them. But those caught in the line of fire are living with unimaginable trauma, constant fear, and a future torn apart.

The long‑term, devastating cost of this war will far exceed anything we can currently calculate.

A song from the 1960s asked a simple question: What is war good for?

Absolutely nothing.

DEJA UNA RESPUESTA

Por favor ingrese su comentario!
Por favor ingrese su nombre aquí