2.1 C
Philadelphia
spot_img
Inicio Blog Página 568

Shapiro administration encourages eligible families to apply for new UN Bucks Summer food program before august 31 deadline

Harrisburg, PA – Today, Department of Human Services (DHS) Secretary Dr. Val Arkoosh encouraged eligible families who have not yet applied for and received the 2024 SUN Bucks benefit to complete a paper application by August 31. The new nationwide Summer Electronic Benefits Transfer program, also known as SUN Bucks or Summer EBT, helps families who qualify manage increased food costs during the summer months when their children don’t have access to free and reduced-price meals at school.

The Department also announced today that payments are nearly complete for families whose children automatically qualified for the SUN Bucks program because of their involvement in the National School Lunch Program. Those who are not automatically eligible can use the SUN Bucks Eligibility Navigator to see if they need to apply by the August 31 deadline. 

“I urge all Pennsylvania families who believe they are eligible for SUN Bucks and have not received a payment yet to use our Eligibility Navigator to see if they need to get their SUN Bucks application in by August 31,” said Secretary Arkoosh. “The Shapiro Administration is proud to be nearing completion of all automatic 2024 SUN Bucks payments, but we do not want a single child who is eligible for this program to not receive the money for food that they are entitled to.”

Because this is the first year of the program, benefits were issued beginning in mid-August for Summer 2024. If families already have an EBT card, SUN Bucks benefits will be automatically added to this card, if possible. Families who do not have an EBT card will receive a Summer EBT card in the mail.

All 2024 SUN Bucks benefits will be issued by the end of October. Applications can be printed from the SUN Bucks website or are available at local County Assistance Offices. Families can also use the Sun Bucks Eligibility Navigator to see if they are eligible for this benefit. Applications received after August 31stwill be held and considered for 2025 SUN Bucks benefits that will be issued in Summer 2025. 

Free or reduced-priced meals during the school year provide critical nutrition to students that is an essential foundation for learning and positive child development– that’s why Governor Josh Shapiro fought to secure universal free breakfast for Pennsylvania students in his first two budgets. During the summer months, these same students and families may be strained by higher food bills when school is closed. This year, Pennsylvania opted in to the new nationwide Summer Electronic Benefits Transfer program. SUN Bucks will provide a one-time payment for households of $40 per summer month ($120 maximum) per eligible child. An estimated 1.2 million children in Pennsylvania qualify for this new program, a benefit that is paid for by federal funds.

Families whose children are not automatically eligible, including those who attend a school where all students receive free or reduced-price school meals under the Community Eligibility Provision but the family does not meet the automatic eligibility criteria, will need to complete a paper SUN Bucks application. 

Find more information about SUN Bucks benefits and start an application.

City announces opening of 2024 community resilience and environmental justice funding opportunity 

justice

PHILADELPHIA. – The City’s Office of Sustainability in partnership with the Philadelphia City Fund, is excited to announce the opening of applications for the Community Resilience and Environmental Justice (CREJ) Fund

The CREJ Fund addresses the need to invest in the grassroot activism that residents living on the frontlines of environmental harm engage in every day. As such, the Fund is dedicated to resourcing frontline and fence line communities experiencing environmental injustice to advance their vision of an equitable and resilient future. The CREJ Fund is steered by the Philadelphia Environmental Justice Advisory Commission and supported by the Office of Sustainability and William Penn Foundation. 

The CREJ Fund will provide 12-month, $15,000 grants to 20 organizations and projects working towards long-term environmental justice (EJ) in Philadelphia. Organizations are encouraged to allocate up to $1,500 towards the wellness of their team, staff and leadership. Eligible projects include coalition and collaboration building activities; community organizing; organizational capacity building; removing barriers that create and perpetuate environmental injustice; education and engagement; youth leadership and development; community-driven planning for EJ, climate adaptation and preparedness, energy efficiency and renewable energy; and implementation of projects related to EJ or community resilience. Organizations whose general operations focus on such activities are welcome to apply for general operating funds.  

“Last year’s CREJ grantees represented the breadth of Philadelphia’s environmental justice issues with projects seeking to improve food sovereignty, greening and tree canopy, heat and flood resilience, waste reduction and more,” said Elizabeth Lankenau, Interim Director of the Office of Sustainability. “We’re thrilled to continue resourcing community leaders and collectively working towards a safer, cleaner, and greener city for all Philadelphia residents.”  

To be eligible for a grant from the Community Resilience and Environmental Justice Fund, organizations must be: 

  • Located in Philadelphia and serving Philadelphians experiencing environmental injustices,
  • Led by people most affected by the problem or issue that is being addressed, 
  • Working on a long-term plan for EJ (see FAQ document for more details),
  • and a 501(c)3 or a community-based organization (including school-based youth groups) working with a 501(c)3 fiscal sponsor. 

blog post will be updated regularly with updates on the CREJ Fund including application information sessions.

### 

About the City’s Office of Sustainability
The Office of Sustainability (OOS) works with partners around the city to improve quality of life in all Philadelphia neighborhoods, through advancing environmental justice, reducing the city’s carbon emissions, and preparing Philadelphia for a hotter and wetter future. The Municipal Energy Office, housed within OOS, is responsible for managing the municipal energy portfolio and its contribution towards carbon reductions. For more information, visit phila.gov/sustainability

About the Philadelphia City Fund
The Philadelphia City Fund is an independent charitable organization which serves as the dedicated fiscal sponsor for the City of Philadelphia and leverages public-private partnerships in collaboration with the City, the philanthropic community, and the residents of Philadelphia.

About William Penn Foundation 
The William Penn Foundation, founded in 1945 by Otto and Phoebe Haas, is committed to expanding access to resources and opportunities that promote a more vital and just city and region for all. We do this through funding programs in the Philadelphia region in arts and culture, children and families, democracy and civic initiatives, environment and public space, and workforce training and services. Learn more at www.williampennfoundation.org

Celebro la CND, pero no necesariamente su plataforma sobre Puerto Rico

Puerto Rico
María Quiñones Sánchez. (Foto: Archivo)

Estoy muy animada celebrado “la Convención Nacional Demócrata”, pero a la misma vez, me siento muy preocupada sobre la plataforma política especificada sobre el estatus de Puerto Rico.

Mientras desde Filadelfia miraba la Convención, sentía la inspiración y el estímulo de un Partido Demócrata que resurgía en Chicago, y llegaba a Pensilvania.

Soy la primera latina elegida al Consejo Municipal de Filadelfia. Sé por experiencia propia, lo difícil que es para las mujeres lograr profesión y respeto, por eso no puedo contener la emoción que siento, sobre la posibilidad de elegir a Kamala Harris como presidenta. Pero la plataforma política de la “Convención Nacional Demócrata”, en cuanto al futuro de Puerto Rico, me llena de preocupación, disminuyendo mi entusiasmo.

Como puertorriqueña, el futuro de mi Isla me preocupa. De hecho, somos muchos los puertorriqueños que estamos preocupados por el futuro de Puerto Rico. Pensilvania, estado donde resido, cuenta con la tercera concentración de puertorriqueños más grande, después de Nueva York y Florida. En Pensilvania residimos más de medio millón de puertorriqueños.

Déjeme explicarle; yo nací en Puerto Rico, pero crecí en Filadelfia. Mi esposo y yo tenemos una casa en la Isla. Ahí pasamos tiempo con nuestra familia que aún viven en los pueblos de San Lorenzo y Barranquitas. Después de sufrir los huracanes, Irma y María en la isla, he sido testigo de la disparidad, y los desafíos económicos que enfrenta Puerto Rico. Estamos aquí, pero en nuestros corazones, votamos con Puerto Rico.

En la plataforma política de la “Convención Nacional Demócrata”, hay varias posiciones aceptables sobre Puerto Rico. Esto incluye ponerle fin a “la Junta Fiscal” impuesta por el Congreso, una Junta no electa por el pueblo. Dicha Junta está plagada de conflictos de intereses. Esta Junta es pagada con fondos públicos regidos por medidas legítimas, y promulgadas democráticamente. La prensa local le exige transparencia, pero rehúsa darla.

Sin embargo, la plataforma política demócrata, está desviada en la cuestión del estatus político de Puerto Rico.

El Partido Demócrata apoya la promulgación de la ley de estatus de Puerto Rico (PRSA) por sus iniciales en inglés, llamado en la Isla, “Plebiscito Criollo”. Este proyecto de ley propone descolonizar a Puerto Rico, cambiando para siempre el estatus de Puerto Rico. La Isla ha sido una colonia estadounidense desde el 1898. Para tomar una decisión tan monumental, es necesario que los puertorriqueños tengan detalles claros y válidos, sobre las implicaciones que cada una de estas opciones, estadidad, independencia o soberanía en libre asociación con los Estados Unidos, envuelven.

El problema con este proyecto de ley es simple, no provee información clara y necesaria, en esta materia tan crítica. De hecho, simplemente, la información que provee es limitada. Por un lado, si el pueblo puertorriqueño elije la estadidad, el proyecto no indica o dice, si el español será o no el idioma que será usado en las escuelas, los tribunales, las agencias gubernamentales, y las agencias vigentes en Puerto Rico.

Hablar español no es simplemente una habilidad puertorriqueña, es el núcleo, el corazón de nuestra identidad. La importancia de nuestro idioma domina nuestra expresión, nuestra vida como puertorriqueños. Por esta y muchas más razones, si el español puede dejar de ser el idioma oficial en la Isla, este punto debe de ser claro y quedar totalmente explicado.

El proyecto de ley tampoco es claro, en cuanto a si los puertorriqueños estarían sujetos a una tasa de impuesto de un 70% bajo la estadidad, y cuándo este impuesto se aplicaría. Esto presenta graves implicaciones para las familias y los trabajadores, ya que podrían enfrentar despidos masivos, mientras el gobierno de Puerto Rico sigue luchando por pagar una deuda restructurada.

En los últimos años, millonarios y multi millonarios estadounidenses, se han establecido en Puerto Rico, beneficiándose del resquicio legal, que les permite no pagar impuestos sobre las ganancias de capital. ¿Les será permitido a estos residentes participar en un referéndum sobre el estatus?

Mientras tanto, a nuestros familiares desplazados por problemas económicos, y los estragos del huracán María, se les niega la participación.

Este proyecto de ley ni dice quién o prohíbe quién puede tomar decisiones sobre el futuro de Puerto Rico. Aunque no explica las implicaciones que trae la anexión, se extralimita, sugiriendo qué tipo de constitución debería tener un Puerto Rico independiente. Simplemente se interpone, obstruyendo el derecho de los pueblos a autodeterminarse, y a desarrollar lo que sería una nueva república latinoamericana y caribeña.

Ignorar los problemas críticos e influenciar en un proceso político, son las características de un proyecto de descolonización, destinado al fracaso.

Desafortunadamente, este proyecto de ley (PRSA), está encamino a ser una casilla de verificación para el Congreso, pero el pueblo puertorriqueño, que ha sido repetidamente defraudado por Washington, no lo aceptará.

El Partido Demócrata puede y debe, apoyar la transparencia total y directa.

Preservar la democracia, no es simplemente una cuestión de derrotar a un violento culto “MAGA”, también exige que tratemos a los pueblos del Caribe, y de las islas del Pacífico, sometidos a 126 años de colonialismo estadounidense, de una manera que restaure y sirva a la democracia.

Esta opinión fue publicada originalmente en The Inquirer el 22 de agosto 2024.

Se siguen sumando más republicanos a la campaña Harris/Walz, después de una convención históricamente bipartidista

La vicepresidenta de EE. UU., Kamala Harris, participa en un mitin de campaña en el Fiserv Arena en Milwaukee, Wisconsin, EE. UU., el 20 de agosto de 2024. (Foto: EFE/Justin Lane)

La Convención Nacional Demócrata 2024, según la campaña es el evento político nacional más bipartidista de la historia reciente de Estados Unidos, y dieron a conocer que más de 230 antiguos líderes y ex personal republicanos han respaldado a la vicepresidenta Harris, sumándose a la creciente lista de republicanos que están poniendo su país, antes de su partido, en estas elecciones.

Entre ellos se encuentran el general retirado Larry Ellis y 238 ex empleados de McCain, Romney y Bush.

El general Ellis es un veterano de prestigio y un líder militar con 45 años de servicio, bajo 10 administraciones presidenciales. Como Ellis explica en su respaldo, ha decidido involucrarse en la política por primera vez en su larga carrera debido a la gravedad de la amenaza que Donald Trump representa para nuestra nación, y los valores que el general Ellis pasó tantos años defendiendo.

Este martes, 238 antiguos empleados de McCain, Romney y Bush también han anunciado su apoyo en una carta en la que piden a sus compañeros republicanos que se unan a ellos en el apoyo a la fórmula Harris-Walz porque la vicepresidenta y el gobernador Walz son líderes “que lucharán por el consenso, no por el caos; que trabajarán para unir, no para dividir; que harán que nuestro país y nuestros hijos se sientan orgullosos”.

Este apoyo se suma al fuerte respaldo que ya recibe la vicepresidenta Harris de voces moderadas e independientes, como:

Más allá de su apoyo, innumerables exdirigentes que trabajaron para Donald Trump han declarado públicamente sobre su comportamiento peligroso y errático:

  • Esta misma semana saltó la noticia de que el asesor de Seguridad Nacional de Trump, H.R. McMaster, rompió su silencio y compartió un “relato ampuloso” de su paso por la Casa Blanca de Trump y de la afinidad de Trump a los dictadores.
  • Muchos funcionarios de seguridad nacional y militares de la administración Trump han hablado públicamente para advertir a la nación sobre la incapacidad de Trump para el cargo, incluyendo John BoltonMark EsperJohn Kelly e innumerables otros líderes.
  • Varios líderes del Partido Republicano en el tema de seguridad nacional ya han respaldado a la vicepresidenta, entre ellos Adam Kinzinger y Olivia Troye.

La siguiente es una declaración de Austin Weatherford, Director Nacional de Alcance Republicano para Harris-Walz 2024:

“Los cientos de republicanos que han respaldado a la vicepresidenta Harris y al gobernador Walz son un testimonio de que en la coalición Harris-Walz hay un lugar para los votantes que se preocupan por nuestra democracia y quieren ver bipartidismo y resultados en lugar de división y caos. Durante los próximos 71 días, seguiremos trabajando sin descanso para llegar a los votantes moderados, republicanos e independientes. Estos respaldos son una poderosa herramienta para la campaña, ya que seguimos poniendo a los republicanos patriotas en el centro de nuestras actividades de alcance para que puedan explicar, con sus propias palabras a sus compañeros republicanos, por qué apoyan a la vicepresidenta Harris”.

En la carta abierta, publicada por primera vez el lunes por USA Today, 238 personas que trabajaron para el expresidente George H. W. Bush, el expresidente George W. Bush, el exsenador de Arizona John McCain y el senador de Utah Mitt Romney piden a sus compañeros “republicanos moderados e independientes conservadores” que se unan a ellos para apoyar a Harris y a su compañero de fórmula, el gobernador de Minnesota Tim Walz, frente a Trump y su candidato a la vicepresidencia, el senador JD Vance de Ohio.

“Por supuesto, tenemos muchos desacuerdos honestos e ideológicos con la vicepresidenta Harris y el gobernador Walz”, escribieron los republicanos, señalando la importancia de un puñado de estados disputados que resultaron cruciales para el estrecho margen de victoria del demócrata Joe Biden en 2020. “Eso es de esperar. La alternativa, sin embargo, es simplemente insostenible”.

Entre los firmantes se encuentran Reed Galen, quien trabajó para las campañas de George W. Bush y McCain y quien cofundó el grupo contra Trump The Lincoln Project, y Olivia Troye, excolaboradora de George W. Bush y asesora de seguridad nacional del vicepresidente de Trump, Mike Pence. El abanico de puestos representados va desde jefe de despacho hasta becario.

EFE/EPA/ALLISON DINNER

“Otros cuatro años del caótico liderazgo de Donald Trump”, señalan los firmantes, “esta vez centrado en avanzar en los peligrosos objetivos del Proyecto 2025, perjudicará a la gente real y cotidiana y debilitará nuestras sagradas instituciones”. La carta continúa advirtiendo que “los movimientos amplios y democráticos se verán irreparablemente en peligro a medida que Trump y su acólito JD Vance se dobleguen ante dictadores como Vladímir Putin mientras dan la espalda a nuestros aliados”.

En un comunicado, el portavoz de la campaña de Trump, Steven Cheung, calificó la carta de “hilarante porque nadie sabe quiénes son estas personas”.

“Preferirían ver arder el país antes que ver al presidente Trump regresar con éxito a la Casa Blanca para ‘Hacer grande a Estados Unidos otra vez’”, añadió Cheung.

Miguel Cardona llama a descentralizar y despolitizar la educación en Puerto Rico

Puerto Rico
Ministro de Educación de Estados Unidos, Miguel Cardona. (Foto: EFE/Octavio Guzmán/Archivo)

San Juan, Puerto Rico.- El secretario de Educación de Estados Unidos, Miguel Cardona, llamó a «descentralizar y despolitizar» el sistema educativo en Puerto Rico, durante una visita a la isla para tratar un proyecto que busca transformar su gobernanza escolar.

Cardona participó en la Cumbre de la Iniciativa de Descentralización Educativa y Autonomía Regional (IDEAR) en la ciudad sureña de Ponce, que reunió a colaboradores clave de los esfuerzos de descentralización.

«Hay que trabajar para sacar la política del salón de clases. No solo hay que descentralizar, sino también despolitizar el sistema educativo», afirmó Cardona ante miembros de la Junta Ejecutiva de IDEAR, directores de escuela y otros líderes educativos.

En mayo de 2023, el Gobierno de Puerto Rico anunció que iba a lanzar el mencionado proyecto IDEAR, que plantea separar las funciones de la Agencia de Educación Estatal (SEA, en inglés) y de la Agencia de Educación Local (LEA, en inglés).

Este modelo permitirá que cada LEA tenga acceso directo a fondos estatales y federales y controle su propio presupuesto, sus recursos humanos y sus compras desde el nivel comunitario regional Puerto Rico es el sexto distrito escolar más grande de EE. UU. y opera como un sistema de educación unitario, lo que ocurre en pocas otras jurisdicciones.

Las críticas al Departamento de Educación local han sido habituales en los últimos años debido a la complicada burocracia interna, que ha fomentado denuncias de ineficiencia e incluso corrupción.

Durante su visita a Puerto Rico, Cardona visitó asimismo el centro comunitario de la Red por los Derechos de la Niñez y la Juventud de Puerto Rico.

El pasado junio, Cardona afirmó que continuaba apoyando los esfuerzos del Departamento de Educación de Puerto Rico para descentralizar su sistema, que «históricamente ha limitado» a las comunidades locales el acceso y la toma de decisiones sobre el mejor uso de los fondos para la educación.

Texas elimina a más de un millón de votantes de los registros en medio de críticas

votantes
Una pancarta que indica el lugar de voto es puesta en la entrada de un centro de votación en el norte de Austin en Texas. Fotografía de archivo. (Foto: EFE/Damià Bonmatí9

Texas ha eliminado más de un millón de personas de las listas de votantes del estado desde 2021, según un informe del gobernador republicano Greg Abbott, que ha sido criticado este martes por la Unión Estadounidense de Libertades Civiles (ACLU, en inglés).

Abbott informó que desde que entró en vigor una ley de 2021 para purgar las listas de votantes registrados se han retirado más de un millón de nombres como parte de su estrategia contra el fraude electoral.

Más de 463.000 personas se encontraban en las lista de suspenso, como se clasifica a los votantes de los que no se conoce su dirección actual.

Otros 457.000 nombres de votantes fueron eliminados de las listas porque fallecieron, y más de 134.000 votantes se mudaron fuera del estado.

Más de 6.000 votantes fueron declarados culpables por un crimen grave lo que les impide votar, según la ley de Texas

También fueron sacados los nombres de 6.500 personas porque se les consideró que no eran ciudadanos, según los registros del estado, y si bien esta cifra representa menos del 1% de la purga el republicano ha subrayado la purga de los inmigrantes.

“Estas reformas han llevado a la eliminación de más de un millón de personas no elegibles de nuestras listas de votantes en los últimos tres años, incluidos no ciudadanos, votantes fallecidos y personas que se mudaron a otro estado”, dijo el republicano en un comunicado.

Aseguró que de los más de 6.500 inmigrantes eliminados de las listas de votantes, aproximadamente 1.930 tienen antecedentes electorales, que serán investigados por la Fiscalía de Texas.

ACLU aseguró este martes que los datos presentados están “fuera de contexto”

Ashley Harris, abogada de ACLU Texas, dijo que Texas tiene una “larga historia de marcar incorrectamente a personas como posibles no ciudadanos”, lo que pone en duda los datos entregados por el Gobierno de Abbott, según información citada por Fox.

ACLU resaltó que el mantenimiento de las listas de votantes “es una rutina y ‘no’ indica una mala conducta”.

Abbott fue criticado por alentar la retórica de fraude cuando en Texas es muy raro que se detecten esta clase de casos.

La organización alentó a las personas a verificar su registro electoral y recordó que los votantes se pueden registrar antes del 7 de octubre en Texas.

Los datos fueron entregados por Abbott justo cuando Texas está en el ojo del huracán después que la Fiscalía del estado ordenara allanamientos a voluntarios y activistas demócratas que impulsan el registro de votantes el martes pasado por supuesto fraude electoral.

LULAC, el grupo hispano más antiguo de EE. UU., solicitó este lunes al Departamento de Justicia de EE. UU. investigar los allanamientos realizados por orden del fiscal de Texas, el republicano Ken Paxton.

Estudio: Latinas contribuyeron 1,3 billones de dólares al PIB de EE. UU., el equivalente a todo Florida

Latinas
La cajera Rosa Dilone ayuda a clientes en el supermercado Mi Tierra en Hazleton, Pensilvania, el 16 de mayo de 2024. (Foto: AP/Mark Scolforo/ Archivo)

Las mujeres de origen hispano contribuyeron con 1,3 billones de dólares al producto interno bruto de Estados Unidos en 2021, en comparación con los 661.000 millones de dólares de 2010, lo que implica una tasa de crecimiento casi del triple en comparación con los grupos no hispanos durante ese mismo periodo, según un nuevo informe financiado por Bank of America y realizado por profesores de la Universidad Luterana de California y la Universidad de California, campus Los Ángeles (UCLA).

El informe se elaboró mediante la recopilación de datos económicos y demográficos disponibles al público de agencias federales, y demuestra que “las latinas son motores de vitalidad económica en Estados Unidos”, dijo el lunes el economista Matthew Fienup, uno de los autores del estudio y director ejecutivo del Centro para la Investigación y Prospectiva Económica de la Universidad Luterana de California, en una conferencia por Zoom para presentar los hallazgos de su informe.

“Las mujeres latinas superan a sus pares étnicos y de género en métricas económicas clave, incluidos niveles récord de participación en la fuerza laboral, logros educativos y crecimiento de ingresos”, añadió en un comunicado de prensa.

La contribución económica de 1,3 billones de dólares por parte de las latinas es comparable al PIB de Florida, y únicamente superado por los de California, Texas y Nueva York, de acuerdo con la Oficina de Análisis Económico de Estados Unidos.

Fienup afirma que el aumento en la producción económica de las latinas y su crecimiento en la fuerza laboral —nueve veces más rápido que el de grupos no latinos— se refleja en mayores ingresos y movilidad económica.

“Avanzamos en la dirección correcta. Y esa brecha salarial se está reduciendo, a pesar de que las latinas enfrentan ciertas desventajas en comparación con los no latinos en Estados Unidos”, indicó Fienup, añadiendo que las latinas avanzan más rápido que otros grupos en cuestiones de inversión para comenzar sus propios negocios y adquisición de vivienda, a pesar de tener menos acceso a capital.

En general, las mujeres han registrado avances notables en cuanto a representación en puestos de alto rango y en industrias de grandes ingresos. Pero la reducción de la brecha salarial se ha estancado durante casi 20 años, incluso para las latinas. Las trabajadoras latinas y de raza negra experimentan la mayor brecha salarial de cualquier grupo.

Bajo el título “Dando Vida a la Economía”, el nuevo estudio continúa con la labor de seis informes previos sobre los aportes de los latinos al PIB estadounidense realizados en colaboración con Bank of America para examinar las crecientes contribuciones económicas de los latinos que viven en Estados Unidos.

Hay varios factores detrás del acelerado crecimiento económico para las latinas, según David Hayes-Bautista, uno de los coautores del informe y director del Centro para el Estudio de Salud y Cultura Latina de la Facultad de Medicina de la UCLA.

“Inmigrantes latinas de edad avanzada comienzan a salir de la fuerza laboral debido a su edad, y sus hijas y nietas nacidas en Estados Unidos están llenando sus zapatos”, explicó Hayes Bautista en la sesión del lunes por Zoom. Hoy día, las latinas ingresan a la fuerza laboral como profesionales funcionales bilingües con niveles de educación mucho más altos que los de sus predecesoras, creando un efecto de honda, añadió.

“Estas hijas y nietas de inmigrantes están combinando la extraordinaria y desinteresada ética laboral de sus ancestros con el rápido crecimiento de capital humano”, indicó.

Immigrant families in limbo after judge puts U.S. program for spouses on hold

Immigrant
Roberto Garcia helps his wife Maria Garcia get into their truck after dropping their two children off for their first day of school in East Los Angeles on Wednesday, Aug. 14, 2024. (Photo: AP/Damian Dovarganes)

After President Joe Biden this summer announced a new U.S. citizenship pathway for immigrant spouses, Oscar Silva rushed to apply and was elated Monday when an email arrived confirming his appointment for a required biometric exam.

But hours later, Silva received a jolt: a federal judge in Texas was temporarily suspending the program that could benefit an estimated 500,000 immigrants in the U.S., freezing in place one of the biggest presidential actions to ease a path to citizenship in years.

“I don’t know what is going to happen,” Silva said Tuesday. The 23-year-old college student arrived in the U.S. as a baby and lives in Texas with his wife, Natalie, an American citizen who provides for their family as a high school teacher.

Although the Biden administration’s “Keeping Families Together” program only began accepting applications last week, families and immigration attorneys say confusion, uncertainty and frustration is already mounting following the order by U.S. District Judge J. Campbell Barker. Couples who already applied say they are in limbo and those who haven’t yet must weigh whether to wait for Republicans’ court challenge over the program to play out.

Applicants must pay a $580 processing fee. Following Barker’s order, the Florida Immigrant Coalition said it was asking people “to weigh their options and to make the best decision for their families at this time.”

The court order followed a challenge by 16 states, led by Republican attorneys general, who filed a federal lawsuit days after the program began taking applications on Aug. 19. Barker’s order, known as an administrative stay, will be in place for 14 days but could be extended.

“That ruling is wrong. These families should not be needlessly separated,” Biden said in a statement.

The states claimed the move would cause irreparable harm and accused the administration of bypassing Congress for “blatant political purposes.”

Republican Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, whose office is helping lead the lawsuit, applauded the order. “This is just the first step. We are going to keep fighting for Texas, our country, and the rule of law,” he said in a statement.

On Tuesday, the Department of Homeland Security said the government would continue to take applications and defend the program in court. Any applicants whose parole was granted prior to the order will be unaffected, according to the department.

DHS did not respond to questions about how many applications were received or approved or how long it takes to determine the outcome of a case under the program.

Fears of separation returned for Silva and his wife, Natalie. Under the traditional process to apply for a green card, spouses living in the U.S. illegally can be required to return to their home country — often for years — and they always face the risk they may not be allowed back in.

“We thought this was finally our opportunity to be able to go through this process together and not fear the possibility of spending ten years away from each other,” Silva said. Now “I feel pretty heartbroken, very sad… because without it we face so much uncertainty.”

Immigration attorney Laura Flores-Perilla said it was “really unclear” what will happen with Silva’s appointment scheduled for September.

“I cannot underestimate the impact that this temporary pause is having,” said Flores-Perilla, an attorney at the Action Justice Center.

Gregory Chen, the director of government relations for the American Immigration Lawyers Association, said he had heard from lawyers affiliated with the association of at least hundreds of people who had applied since the program was launched, including some who applied and were approved the next day.

Lawyers are rushing to understand what the order means for their clients, too. According to Chen, the organization’s listserv for lawyers interested in the Keeping Families Together program “blew up” after the judge’s decision late Monday with questions about what the decision means.

Advocates are concerned the changes, even temporary ones, created by such litigation “creates chaos and uncertainty” for those looking to apply. Chen said he’s seen the effect litigation has had on other immigration-related programs.

His organization has held three webinars designed to educate lawyers about the program. One of those seminars had about 1,000 lawyers in attendance, an extremely high number for one of the group’s educational offerings, Chen said.

Roberto García, 37, and his wife Maria in Los Angeles had just paid an attorney $3,000 to help them fill out the lengthy application for the program but the application wasn’t submitted yet because of Monday’s order. Now, they’re wondering if they should gamble their chances and pay the processing fee for a program on hold.

“I didn’t think this was going to happen. It’s very hard,” said Roberto Garcia, referring to the order that halted the parole program. “We are not a priority. It is bad that they play with people’s feelings.”

Roberto is the sole provider for the family of five and earns a living through this construction business in California. He also sends money back home to family in Mexico.

If approved, applicants have three years to seek permanent residency. During that period, they can get a work authorization.

But Maria García said she is losing hope and considering moving to Mexico, where her husband has his parents and brothers.

“We will never be able to buy a house here,” she said. “Here if you do things wrong, they reward you. If you do things right, they punish you.»

Harris campaign releases new ad to highlight plans to build 3 million homes and reduce inflation

Harris
Vice President Kamala Harris speaks in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building on the White House complex in Washington, June 17, 2024. (Photo: AP/Susan Walsh/File)

Vice President Kamala Harris has a new advertising push to draw attention to her plan to build 3 million new homes over four years, a move designed to contain inflationary pressures that also draws a sharp contrast to Republican Donald Trump’s approach.

Harris, the Democratic nominee for president, highlights her plan in a new minute-long ad released Tuesday that uses her personal experience, growing up in rental housing while her mother saved for a decade before she could buy a home. The ad targets voters in the swing states including Arizona and Nevada. Campaign surrogates are also holding 20 events this week focused on housing issues.

In addition to increasing home construction, Harris is proposing the government provide as much as $25,000 in assistance to first-time buyers. That message could carry weight at this moment as housing costs have kept upward pressure on the consumer price index. Shelter costs are up 5.1% over the past 12 months, compared to overall inflation being 2.9%, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

“Vice President Harris knows we need to do more to address our housing crisis and that’s why she has a plan to end the housing shortage” and will crack down on “corporate landlords and Wall Street banks hiking up rents and housing costs,” said Dan Kanninen, the campaign’s battleground states director.

The Harris plan would create tax breaks for homebuilders focused on first-time buyers and expand existing incentives for companies that construct rental housing. Because local zoning often restricts the supply of homes, she would also double the available funding to $40 billion to encourage local governments to remove the regulations that prevent additional construction.

A housing development in Cranberry Township, Pa., is shown on March 29, 2024. (Photo: AP/Gene J. Puskar)

Although Trump made his reputation as a real estate developer, data shows that there was a shortage of available housing during his presidency that has continued.

That shortage became more problematic when inflation jumped as the country recovered from the pandemic and faced higher food and energy costs after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. The high inflation damaged the approval ratings of President Joe Biden, who Republicans and some economists blamed for sparking the price runups with his pandemic aid.

Mortgage rates climbed to levels that were prohibitively high for many would-be buyers. At the same time, many existing homeowners held off on listing their properties for sale in ways that compounded the inflation challenge.

Trump has floated an array of ideas for lowering housing costs — including his suggestion in a June speech in Wisconsin that stopping illegal immigration would reduce demand for housing and bring down prices.

“I will also stop inflation by stopping the invasion, rapidly reducing housing costs,” Trump said.

There is also the possibility of opening up more federal land for home construction with the Trump campaign proposing a competition to charter as many as 10 new cities. Economists supportive of Trump’s agenda have suggested — despite deficits climbing during his presidency — that Trump would get federal spending under control if he was president again, which would lower interest rates.

The Trump campaign has also opposed efforts by Democrats to encourage the construction of apartments and condominiums in suburbs and cities, which could alleviate the housing shortage. Trump has said in a video that such efforts are “Marxist” and would be a “war on the suburbs” that would destroy property values.

Democratic presidential nominee Vice President Kamala Harris, right, waves as she steps from Air Force Two upon the arrival at Joint Base Andrews, Md, Friday, Aug. 23, 2024. (Photo: AP/Kevin Lamarque)

Karoline Leavitt, the Trump campaign’s national press secretary, in a statement said that “Kamalanomics” is to blame for home ownership becoming less attainable, an attempt to undermine Harris’ message of being a change candidate who can open up opportunities for the middle class.

Trump’s main play has been to claim that Harris can’t pay for her housing agenda. That’s even though he also attacks her for supporting tax increases and other revenue raisers proposed by Biden that could in theory offset the costs.

“She has no clue how’d she paid for $25,000 to every first-time homebuyer, including illegals,” said Trump at an August 19 rally in York, Pennsylvania, claiming without clear evidence that her policy would support immigrants without legal status.

The Harris campaign plans to hold housing affordability events in the Pennsylvania cities of Harrisburg, Philadelphia and Pittsburgh, as well as the Arizona cities of Phoenix and Tucson. There will also be events in the Nevada cities of Las Vegas and Reno and the North Carolina cities of Asheville and Charlotte, in addition to Savannah, Georgia.

Governor Shapiro, legislators, educators, ands students celebrate historic K-12

students

Central Dauphin School District will benefit directly from the new adequacy formula, receiving more than $6 million through that formula designed to ensure schools with the greatest need receive the most support 

Harrisburg, PA – Today, Governor Josh Shapiro and Pennsylvania Department of Education Secretary Dr. Khalid N. Mumin visited Central Dauphin Middle School in Harrisburg, Dauphin County, to meet with students, teachers, and legislators and celebrate the historic investments in public K-12 education secured in the 2024-25 bipartisan budget – including the creation of a new adequacy formula to drive dollars to the public schools that need them most. 

As students across the Commonwealth return to school, they are benefitting from substantial new investments secured by Governor Shapiro and a bipartisan group of legislators. The 2024-25 budget includes a historic $1.1 billion in total increases in K-12 public education funding, the largest year-over-year increase in Commonwealth history. This budget delivers significant progress on building strong and safe school communities, adequately and equitably funding public schools, supporting our teachers, and ensuring that every Pennsylvania child has the freedom to chart their own course and the opportunity to succeed.  

«In the bipartisan budget I signed last month, Pennsylvania is for the first time ever committing $11 billion to K-12 public education — an increase of $1.1 billion from last year, the largest increase in history. There’s nothing more important than investing in our children and their future, and we’ll continue to work together to deliver for them,» said Governor Shapiro. «This budget builds on our progress investing in student teacher stipends, mental health resources, and school environmental repairs — while we also improve how school funding is allocated with a new formula that drives dollars out to the schools who need it most.» 

Central Dauphin Middle School will significantly benefit from the 2024-25 bipartisan budget’s investments and the new adequacy formula. This middle school is part of the Central Dauphin School District — the 8th largest in the Commonwealth and the largest among the 10 districts in Dauphin County. The district is set to receive approximately $8.8 million more than last year thanks to this budget — bringing their total to $44.3 million for the 2024-25 school year. The district serves around 12,000 students from urban, suburban, and rural areas, who attend one of its 13 elementary schools, four middle schools, and two high schools. 

«It’s exciting to be at Central Dauphin Middle School today with Governor Shapiro as students, teachers, and staff kick off the first week of school. As I look back on my own experiences as a superintendent years ago, I’m both amazed and inspired by how much education has evolved over the years. Yet, no matter how much things change, the start of a new school year always brings a sense of joy, renewal, and endless possibilities,» said Secretary of Education Dr. Mumin. «What makes this moment even more special is knowing that, thanks to Governor Shapiro’s historic investments for two consecutive years and the unwavering focus this Administration has placed on education in Pennsylvania, our schools are not just improving — they’re poised for generations of greatness. The future is bright, and I’m thrilled to be part of this journey.» 

The 2024-25 budget delivers significant progress for K-12 education that will give every student the freedom to chart their own course and the opportunity to succeed. This budget includes funding for:  

·         Historic Basic Education Funding: Building on the investments in the Governor’s first budget, the 2024-25 budget makes another historic down payment in K-12 education funding in Pennsylvania with an increase of $1.1 billion. Of this funding, nearly $526 million will be distributed through a new adequacy formula to drive dollars to the schools that need them most. 

·         Increases to Special Education: Governor Shapiro’s budget increases special education funding by $100 million to ensure that school districts have the basic resources necessary to provide high-quality special education services to students with disabilities and special needs.  

·         Cyber Charter Reimbursement: The 2024-2025 budget sets aside $100 million to reimburse schools for payments they must make to cyber charter schools. 

·         Career and Technical Education and Dual Enrollment: Creating real opportunity for students includes expanding options for them to gain experience, training, and advanced credit for college while still in high school. The Governor’s budget includes a $30 million increase for Career and Technical Education and continues $7 million in support of dual enrollment.  

·         School Safety and Security and Mental Health Services: Every student deserves to be safe and feel safe in their school. The 2024-25 budget continues a $20 million annual investment in school safety and security improvements and provides $100 million in sustainable funding for environmental repairs and other facility projects in schools – $25 million of which is set aside for solar projects at schools. This budget also delivers $100 million to put more mental health and physical safety resources in our schools

·         Providing Period Products for Students: No student should have to miss school due to not being able to afford basic necessities like menstrual hygiene products. The Governor’s budget invests $3 million to provide menstrual hygiene products at no cost to students in schools.  

·         Investing in Early Childhood Learning: Every child in Pennsylvania deserves the support and resources to succeed, from infancy through adulthood. The budget invests an additional $2.7 million in the Head Start Supplemental Assistance Program and an additional $15 million for the Pre-K Counts program.  

·         Supporting Student Teacher Stipends: To further strengthen the educator pipeline and address the education workforce shortage, the 2024-25 budget doubles funding for student teacher stipends, for a total of $20 million to support Pennsylvanians training to become certified and committed educators in the Commonwealth. 

The Governor was joined for a ceremonial bill signing by Central Dauphin School District (CDSD) Superintendent Eric Turman, President of the CDSD Board of Directors Michael Jacobs, Central Dauphin Middle School teacher Kim Pearl and student Heidi Bertsch, as well as local and state legislators. 

«Central Dauphin School District is grateful to Governor Shapiro and state legislators for the increase in basic education funding included in this year’s budget. As the fastest growing district in Dauphin County and the most diverse, this funding will allow us to bring resources to our students that will help support academics, safety, and their overall mental health,” said Superintendent Turman. “Boosts in revenue can help close the educational gap. We are keenly focused on the wealth disparity in the district, and we educate many students from families living below the poverty line. One aspect of the new school year that brings us pride is being able to provide a meal for all students in our district.”   

“With the passage of the state budget this year, educators from all over the state can take pride in Governor Shapiro’s leadership in guiding Pennsylvania’s legislators to come together to ensure equity and funding for students across Pennsylvania,” said Pearl. “We rely on state funding to support so many of the opportunities we provide for our students. All of these opportunities should be available to every student in Pennsylvania, regardless of their zip code. Fair funding for public schools is an important step in ensuring equity for our children.” 

“The teachers, principals, and staff members at Central Dauphin Middle School have played a pivotal role in shaping my life, providing guidance, support, and a caring environment for me to learn in,” said Bertsch. “They have taught me life lessons, including perseverance, teamwork, and the importance of curiosity. They have provided me with many opportunities, like sports clubs and other community services.” 

“The General Assembly and Shapiro Administration took an important step in providing record funding for public education in the latest budget. This acknowledges the shortfall in funding, and the directive from the Commonwealth Court to provide a ‘thorough and efficient’ education for every Pennsylvania child,” said Representative Justin Fleming. “While this funding will help, there is plenty of work to do to ensure that children in the Central Dauphin School District and across the Commonwealth receive the funding they deserve.” 

“Excellent schooling can only exist where there is proper funding to support it, and that’s what this budget delivers to schools all over Pennsylvania,” said Representative Patty Kim. “Historic investments this year empower every child with better-paid teachers, modern technology, and strong buildings and classrooms. This budget is more than a piece of legislation – it provides the tools for a better future for all.” 

«Today at Central Dauphin Middle School, I witnessed the tangible results of our historical investment in education,» said Representative Dave Madsen. «Thanks to this year’s funding, schools across the district are now better equipped to support every student’s success. Central Dauphin’s commitment to providing free breakfast and lunch to all students is just one example of how our efforts are already making a meaningful difference in children’s lives.» 

    
For more information on how the 2024-25 budget will create opportunity for Pennsylvanians, visit shapirobudget.pa.gov.