El Hospital Infantil Saint Christopher repartirá mochilas escolares este 8 de agosto. (Foto: RRSS)
Por décimo quinto año consecutivo, el Hospital Infantil Saint Christopher organiza un carnaval de verano con regalo de mochilas para los estudiantes, para el cual contará con la ayuda y la participación de estudiantes y miembros de la Facultad de Medicina de la Universidad de Drexel.
La organización informa que habrá excelente comida, juegos divertidos, recursos comunitarios gratuitos para las familias y mochilas gratis completas con sus útiles escolares, hasta agotar existencias. Tener en cuenta que los niños deben estar presentes para recibir las mochilas.
Desde el primer carnaval que realizó el prestigioso centro médico, el evento les ha regalado una sonrisa a casi 15,000 niños y sus familias; y les ha proporcionado los útiles escolares necesarios a centenares de niños.
El evento que es organizado por el centro para niños y jóvenes con necesidades médicas especiales de St. Christopher’s y la Universidad de Medicina Drexel, se realizará el 8 de agosto de 11 a. m. a 3 p.m. en el estacionamiento del hospital.
Foto difundida por el Registro de Delincuentes Sexuales del estado de Nueva York, que muestra al financista Jeffrey Epstein, el 28 de marzo del 2017. (Foto: AP/Registro de Delincuentes Sexuales del estado de Nueva York)
There are millions of people in the public who want to know the truth, I mean, all the truth, about the Jeffrey Epstein files.
Let’s find out who is in the files. We might be surprised by the names that pop up: powerful politicians, wealthy men, celebrities, and others. We should not protect any of them. “It makes us ask if Trump was aware of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell’s criminal actions, especially given his statement two years later that his good friend Jeffrey ‘likes women on the younger side… no doubt about it.’ We and the public are asking for answers; survivors deserve this.”
In the pictures and videos most people have seen, there are mostly young, underage white girls with these men, not mature women. You don’t see people of color in the photos or videos either.
Virginia Giuffre, one of Epstein’s victims, died by suicide in April at her farm in Western Australia, at age 41.
The family of Virginia Giuffre, one of Jeffrey Epstein’s most prominent accusers, said recently that it was “shocking” to hear Donald Trump’s recent comments invoking their sister, while urging the president not to pardon the disgraced financier’s accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell.
As a teenager, Giuffre worked as a locker room attendant at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort, where she met Maxwell in 2000. The British socialite offered her a job as a masseuse to Epstein, which allegedly kicked off years of sex trafficking and abuse. Giuffre sued Maxwell for defamation in 2015 after Maxwell called her a “liar,” but the case was settled two years later.
Maxwell is now serving a 20-year sentence after being convicted of helping Epstein sexually abuse minors.
Given what I’ve read about Epstein and Trump’s involvement, they both should have been jailed long ago. Wealthy and powerful friends allowed Epstein to slide through the system for years. And to my surprise, Trump was never even taken to a police station for questioning.
The evidence was—and still is—clear. There was abuse. But the system didn’t want to listen to or accept the testimony of these young girls.
Had Trump or Epstein been people of color accused of abusing children, they would have been front-page news as they were carted off to jail.
(Foto: EFE/CHRISTOPHE PETIT TESSON)
Some rumors
Some say that Epstein once dated Melania, and that issues over Melania are what caused him and Trump to break off their friendship. There are also rumors about a fight over a piece of real estate.
But Trump shouldn’t have just broken off the relationship when he saw that Jeffrey was trafficking and abusing young girls; he should have reported him to the authorities. It’s now clear that Trump was aiding and abetting in covering up an ongoing crime against children.
An FBI examination of the documents reportedly shows that Trump’s name appears at least 51 times.
And now there’s a rumor that Trump’s name was methodically redacted from the Epstein files, according to Bloomberg.
An FBI team worked to black out Trump’s name from Epstein-related investigatory files, according to a new Bloomberg report. The team reportedly used the Freedom of Information Act as their guide for what information should not be made public and justified redacting Trump’s name because he was a private citizen at the time Epstein was under investigation.
Trump has pushed a far-fetched claim that Obama and others created the files and inserted his name.
Rumor has it that more than 100 men are implicated by what’s in the files.
For a long time, some have believed there are incriminating photos of Trump with young girls, both with Epstein and during trips to Russia years ago.
Now, it’s said that Trump has muttered to others that the Epstein files could “fudge/mess him up.”
And there are many other rumors
For years, Republicans have accused Democrats of grooming children, trafficking them, and then abusing them. Now, the right-wing Evangelical community must also demand answers and clarity—because at this point, it looks like they are protecting a pedophile.
Earlier this week, Trump was asked whether Giuffre was one of the people Epstein had “stolen” from the now-president’s Mar-a-Lago club.
Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche sat down with Maxwell last week as part of Trump’s efforts to quell right-wing outrage over his administration’s refusal to release the government’s files on the Epstein case.
Yet Trump has not ruled out pardoning Maxwell, telling reporters: “Well, I’m allowed to give her a pardon, but I—nobody’s approached me with it. Nobody’s asked me about it. It’s in the news, that aspect of it, but right now, it would be inappropriate to talk about it.”
“The reckoning must not end. It must continue,” said Virginia Roberts Giuffre, who had filed lawsuits alleging she was trafficked to Epstein’s rich and powerful friends while underage. “He did not act alone, and we—the victims—know that.”
Here is some of the language victims have shared in their statements:
Sarah Ransome, who said she was a victim of Epstein’s “international sex trafficking” ring, echoed that sentiment: “Please finish what you have started.”
Epstein was being held on charges of sex trafficking and conspiracy when he died awaiting trial. Federal prosecutors in New York had filed new charges amid growing outrage over a 2008 non-prosecution agreement in which Epstein pleaded guilty to lesser charges in Florida. That deal had also shielded potential co-conspirators from prosecution.
We also need to investigate who made that dead-fish-smelling decision to give Jeffrey Epstein a light sentence. There must be a full investigation into that sweetheart deal.
When police conduct an arrest—or have a profile case like this—they must run into names and events involving other powerful men. Their responsibility is to follow the evidence and investigate each individual, regardless of status.
There are many cases where people have been charged and imprisoned based on the testimony of only a few victims, sometimes just one. In Epstein’s case, there was so much evidence that a deal should never have been made.
We don’t need to wait to get the files. We just need to review the facts and testimonies already given by the victims.
Their testimonies were full of anger, sadness, and bitter disappointment at a legal system that they felt had failed them. The accusations against Epstein ranged from sexual abuse to sex trafficking. Trump—and around 100 others—should be charged and tried for this horrific situation.
Actress Anouska De Georgiou said that Epstein abused her for several years, and then stated: “He could not even begin to fathom what he took from us.”
Courtney Wild said Epstein robbed her of her innocence and mental health. “I feel very angry and sad… justice has never been served in this case,” she said, holding back tears.
Annie Farmer, who spoke at Epstein’s bail hearing in July and urged he not be released, said: “I’m so sorry others won’t be able to stand before him as I did.” She had previously alleged that Epstein groped her and assaulted her 16-year-old sister. She said they reported him in 1996, and were ignored.
Jennifer Araoz, who said Epstein began abusing her at age 14, said: “Even though this weak, evil coward tried to steal our childhood… he will never steal our inner strength, and never steal our voice.”
Una foto de Jeffrey Epstein con Ghislaine Maxwell es exhibida en una conferencia de prensa en Nueva York el 2 de julio del 2020. (Foto: AP/John Minchillo)
Jane Doe 1 reflected: “I believe on some level; a lot of girls can relate to our story. Maybe this can be a catalyst for change.” She added that the media had portrayed Epstein as an isolated case: “But it’s so much more common than you realize.”
One disturbing observation: in all the media and legal discussions about these files, there has been no real conversation about the victims and their families receiving counseling or victim compensation from the state or federal government.
According to Epstein’s will, his net worth was over $577 million, and at least five civil suits have already been filed by alleged victims since his death. While some attorneys have mentioned Epstein’s estate during hearings, many alleged victims have said they are hoping for criminal charges against others in Epstein’s circle.
We as citizens must not tolerate the abuse of children just because the perpetrators are rich, white, and powerful.
The challenge is for all of us to read the testimonies of those who were abused—and to join in demanding justice for these victims and their families.
There is more than enough information for honest legal authorities to act. We do not just have a smoking gun—we have a bonfire of evidence, lies, and coverups.
Una foto de Jeffrey Epstein con Ghislaine Maxwell es exhibida en una conferencia de prensa en Nueva York el 2 de julio del 2020. (Foto: AP/John Minchillo)
Una comisión del Congreso estadounidense citó el martes al Departamento de Justicia para obtener archivos sobre la investigación de tráfico sexual de Jeffrey Epstein, como parte de una pesquisa que los legisladores creen podría mostrar vínculos con el presidente Donald Trump y otros exfuncionarios.
El pedido de la Comisión para la Supervisión y Reforma del Gobierno de la Cámara de Representantes, controlada por los republicanos, incluye citaciones para declaraciones con el expresidente Bill Clinton, la exsecretaria de Estado Hillary Clinton y ocho exfuncionarios de las fuerzas del orden.
La decisión muestra cómo, incluso con los legisladores fuera de Washington durante el receso veraniego, el interés en el caso Epstein sigue siendo alto. Trump ha negado tener conocimiento previo de los crímenes de Epstein y ha afirmado que cortó su relación hace mucho tiempo, y ha intentado repetidamente dejar atrás el tema de la decisión del Departamento de Justicia de no publicar un informe completo de la investigación. Pero los legisladores de ambos partidos políticos principales, así como muchos en la base política del presidente republicano, se han negado a dejarlo pasar.
Desde la muerte de Epstein en 2019 en una celda de una cárcel de Nueva York mientras esperaba juicio por cargos de tráfico sexual, los conspiracionistas conservadores han avivado teorías sobre qué información reunieron los investigadores sobre Epstein y quién más podría haber estado involucrado. Los legisladores republicanos de la comisión hicieron referencia a esa línea de cuestionamiento el mes pasado al iniciar las citaciones para los Clinton, ambos demócratas, además de exigir todas las comunicaciones entre la administración demócrata del presidente Joe Biden y el Departamento de Justicia con respecto a Epstein.
La comisión también está exigiendo entrevistas bajo juramento de ex secretarios de Justicia durante las últimas tres administraciones presidenciales: Merrick Garland, William Barr, Jeff Sessions, Loretta Lynch, Eric Holder y Alberto Gonzales. Los legisladores también citaron a los exdirectores del FBI James Comey y Robert Mueller.
Sin embargo, fueron los demócratas quienes impulsaron la medida para citar al Departamento de Justicia por sus archivos sobre Epstein. Se unieron a algunos republicanos para iniciar con éxito la citación a través de un subcomité de la Comisión para la Supervisión del Gobierno.
«Los demócratas están enfocados en la transparencia y están rechazando la corrupción de Donald Trump», declaró el mes pasado a los periodistas el representante Robert Garcia, quien es el principal demócrata en la comisión. «¿Qué está ocultando Donald Trump que no quiere publicar los archivos de Epstein?»
La comisión había emitido previamente una citación para una entrevista con Ghislaine Maxwell, la exnovia de Epstein, quien estaba cumpliendo una sentencia de prisión en Florida por atraer a adolescentes para ser abusadas sexualmente por el acaudalado financiero, pero recientemente fue trasladada a una instalación en Texas. Sin embargo, el presidente republicano de la comisión, el representante James Comer, ha indicado que está dispuesto a retrasar esa declaración hasta que la Corte Suprema decida si escucha una apelación a la condena de Maxwell. Ella argumenta que fue procesada injustamente.
Philadelphia Eagles running back Saquon Barkley speaks during a news conference at the team’s NFL football training camp, Wednesday, July 23, 2025, in Philadelphia. (Photo: AP/Matt Rourke)
PHILADELPHIA. — Saquon Barkley has declined an invitation to join President Donald Trump’s council on sports, fitness, and nutrition, which is being revitalized under an executive order that also reestablishes the Presidential Fitness Test for American children.
Barkley, the 2,000-yard rusher for the Super Bowl champion Philadelphia Eagles, was on a list of sports personalities that included golfers Bryson DeChambeau and Nelly Korda, WWE executive Paul “Triple H” Levesque, football Hall of Famer Lawrence Taylor and retired New York Yankees great Mariano Rivera.
Barkley said Monday following Eagles’ practice that he had actually declined the invitation.
“A couple months ago, it was brought to my team about the council,» Barkley said. «So I’m not really too familiar with it. I felt like that I am going to be super busy. Me and my family thought it would probably be of best interest to not accept that. I was definitely a little shocked when my name was mentioned. I’m assuming it’s something great, so I appreciate it but was a little shocked when my name was mentioned.”
Philadelphia Eagles running back Saquon Barkley runs on to the field during practice at the team’s NFL football training camp, Thursday, July 24, 2025, in Philadelphia. (Photo: AP/Matt Rourke)
Trump reinstates the Physical Fitness Test
Trump last week reestablished the Presidential Fitness Test for American children, a fixture of public schools for decades that gauged young people’s health and athleticism with 1-mile runs, sit-ups and stretching exercises.
“This is a wonderful tradition, and we’re bringing it back,” Trump said of the fitness test that began in 1966 but was phased out during the Obama administration.
The executive order also reinvigorated the national sports council that could have included Barkley.
Barkley won AP Offensive Player of the Year last season after rushing for 2,005 yards, eighth-best in NFL history, in his first season with the Eagles.
Philadelphia Eagles running back Saquon Barkley runs during practice at the team’s NFL football training camp, Thursday, July 24, 2025, in Philadelphia. (Photo: AP/Matt Rourke)
Barkley has golfed with Trump and former President Barack Obama over the last year and the running back attended the White House celebration of the champion Eagles while some teammates — notably star quarterback Jalen Hurts — skipped the ceremony.
Previous relationship between Barkley and Trump
Barkley visited Trump in April at Trump National Golf Club in Bedminster, New Jersey, and caught a ride with the president to Washington on Air Force One and then to the White House on Marine One.
“He loved it,” Trump said then of Barkley’s short flight on the presidential airplane. “He’s a great young guy and an incredible football player. Saquon had a season for the ages, running behind the most powerful offensive line in the NFL.»
Barkley, meanwhile, pushed back on social media criticism following the visit. He noted that he had already golfed with Obama, a Democrat.
“Maybe I just respect the office, not a hard concept to understand,” Barkley posted on X.
Un sismógrafo. (Foto: EFE/Alanah M. Torralba/Archivo)
Santo Domingo.– Un terremoto de magnitud 5,2 sacudió este martes parte de la República Dominicana, sin que hasta el momento se tenga información de daños físicos o materiales.
El movimiento se produjo a las 5.23 hora local (9:23 GTM) a una profundidad de 164,8 kilómetros, y su epicentro se localizó en el mar Caribe, a 40,8 kilómetros al este de Mano Juan, Isla Saona, de acuerdo con el Centro Nacional de Sismología (CNS) de la Universidad de Santo Domingo (UASD)
El sismo se sintió fuerte en varios puntos del país, incluida la capital, según reportaron usuarios de las redes sociales.
Route 47 to Whitman Plaza is one of the most popular buses. (Photo: Impacto staff)
Philadelphia is preparing for a major restructuring of its public transportation system. Starting August 24, 2025, SEPTA will eliminate and modify several bus routes, directly affecting neighborhoods in the Northeast and Center City, especially around 5th Street.
For many residents, the bus is their only reliable and affordable form of transportation. The cancellation of key routes could leave thousands without a way to get to work, school, or medical appointments.
Routes affected near 5th Street:
Route 1: Serves areas in the Northeast, running along Roosevelt Blvd near 5th, 7th, and 9th Streets.
Route 12: Used to connect central and eastern neighborhoods, essential for workers and students.
Route 30: Crucial for those commuting between Center City and West Philadelphia.
Crowded bus stop with people waiting for long hours due to route changes and cancellations. (Photo: Impacto staff)
Our community speaks up
Although many did not want to appear on camera or give their names, they did not hesitate to share their concerns.
“I waited nearly 45 minutes for the bus. If they cancel the route near my house, how am I supposed to get to school?” says Natalia, a young student from Northeast Philly.
“I don’t have a car or friends who can give me a ride. If they take my bus route, I can’t get to work. How am I supposed to support my family?” says Miguel, a construction worker who depends on public transportation.
These stories reflect the fear spreading through our neighborhoods. These are voices that, although not always visible, truly matter.
What can you do?
With these changes just around the corner, it’s important to review alternative routes, coordinate with your employer or school, and plan. The situation could change if new funding is approved, but for now, the service cuts remain.
For more information about SEPTA bus route changes, visit the official website: www.septa.org
Filadelfia se prepara para una reestructuración importante del sistema de transporte público. A partir del 24 de agosto de 2025, SEPTA eliminará y cambiará varias rutas de autobús, afectando directamente a vecindarios del noreste y centro de la ciudad, especialmente alrededor de la Calle 5.
Para muchos residentes, el autobús es la única forma de transporte confiable y económica. La cancelación de rutas clave podría dejar a miles sin manera de llegar al trabajo, la escuela o citas médicas.
Rutas afectadas cerca de la Calle 5:
Ruta 1: Funciona por zonas del noreste, transitando por Roosevelt Blvd cerca de la 5th St, 7th St y 9th St.
Ruta 12: Conectaba barrios del centro y este, esenciales para trabajadores y estudiantes.
Ruta 30: Crucial para quienes viajan entre el centro y oeste de la ciudad.
Parada del autobús Ruta R, que ahora es Ruta 82. (Foto: Impacto staff)
Nuestra gente alza la voz
Aunque muchos no quisieron salir en cámara ni dar su nombre, no dudaron en expresar su preocupación. “Estuve esperando casi 45 minutos el autobús. Si cancelan la ruta cerca de mi casa, ¿cómo voy a llegar a la escuela?”, cuenta Natalia, joven estudiante del noreste.
“No tengo carro, ni amigos que me puedan llevar. Si me quitan el autobús, no llego al trabajo. ¿Cómo mantengo a mi familia?”, dice Miguel, trabajador de la construcción.
Estas historias reflejan el miedo que se vive en nuestras calles. Son voces que, aunque no siempre visibles, importan.
¿Qué puedes hacer?
Con los cambios a la vuelta de la esquina, se recomienda revisar otras rutas, coordinar con empleadores o escuelas y planificar con anticipación. La situación podría cambiar si se aprueba nuevo financiamiento, pero por ahora, los recortes siguen en pie.
Para más información sobre los cambios de autobús de SEPTA y las rutas, visita el sitio oficial www.septa.org
La inteligencia artificial llegó para quedarse. Hoy en día, herramientas como ChatGPT son utilizadas por millones de personas que buscan respuestas inmediatas sobre procesos legales, incluidos los migratorios. Y aunque celebramos el interés de nuestros clientes por estar informados, también creemos que es momento de hacer una pausa y reflexionar:
¿Hasta qué punto es confiable la IA para construir una estrategia migratoria efectiva?
Durante nuestras consultas legales, hemos detectado una tendencia creciente: personas que llegan con dudas, confusiones o incluso pasos errados, basados en información obtenida en línea o a través de plataformas de inteligencia artificial.
Sabemos que ChatGPT puede ofrecer respuestas útiles y generales, pero eso no significa que esté capacitado para armar un caso legal sólido. ¿Por qué? Porque no toma en cuenta los matices, particularidades ni la historia personal de cada migrante.
Errores comunes que hemos observado incluyen:
● Formularios llenados incorrectamente o enviados fuera de los plazos legales.
● Confusión entre categorías migratorias que parecen similares, pero tienen requisitos distintos.
● Expectativas basadas en escenarios ideales que no se aplican al caso individual.
● Omisión de factores clave como antecedentes migratorios, penales o familiares.
¿Cuáles son los límites de la inteligencia artificial en estos casos?
● No interpreta la ley en profundidad ni se actualiza automáticamente con los cambios normativos.
● No analiza de forma integral tu situación legal, ni tu historial migratorio.
● Y, muy importante, no asume ninguna responsabilidad legal si cometes un error por seguir sus sugerencias.
Por eso, insistimos: la asesoría legal sigue siendo fundamental. Un abogado no solo responde preguntas. Un abogado te escucha, te orienta, diseña una estrategia personalizada y, sobre todo, te representa y defiende ante las autoridades migratorias.
La IA puede ser una herramienta útil para comenzar a informarte, pero no puede sustituir el criterio legal, la experiencia ni la responsabilidad profesional que ofrece un abogado calificado. En migración, cada decisión cuenta. Y un paso mal dado puede cerrar puertas o retrasar tu sueño de vivir legalmente en los Estados Unidos.
* Héctor Benítez Cañas es abogado de inmigración en Miami. Su firma Benme Legal se dedica a la práctica exclusiva de la Ley de Inmigración. https://www.benmelegal.org/
El senador Art Haywood, presidente del Comité de Salud y Servicios Humanos, criticó duramente los recortes impulsados por el gobierno federal. (Foto: RRSS)
Miles de familias en Filadelfia y en todo el estado de Pensilvania comenzaron este mes bajo nuevas reglas federales que afectan el acceso a programas esenciales como SNAP (cupones de alimentos). Los cambios, impulsados por una nueva ley federal, impactan particularmente a comunidades inmigrantes y hogares de bajos ingresos.
SNAP: vendrán reglas más duras
Aunque el programa SNAP no sufre modificaciones directas a partir del 1 de agosto, la nueva legislación federal, conocida como la One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBB), ya comenzó su implementación por fases. Las nuevas reglas serán exigidas gradualmente en todos los estados hasta 2026.
Requisitos clave que cambiarán el acceso a SNAP:
Trabajo obligatorio: Adultos entre 18 y 64 años sin hijos ni dependientes deberán trabajar, capacitarse o realizar voluntariado al menos 80 horas al mes (equivalente a 20 horas semanales).
Excepciones más limitadas para padres: Solo estarán exentos quienes tengan hijos de 14 años o menos. Anteriormente, el umbral era 18 años.
Restricciones para inmigrantes con estatus legal: Se requerirán tiempos mínimos de residencia y más documentación para mantener la elegibilidad.
Reducción del beneficio mensual: Se estima que el monto promedio del beneficio bajará en unos 100 dólares por persona.
Edward Bonilla, dueño de 5th Street Supermarket, entiende que esta reducción va a afectar a muchos. (Foto: Impacto/Staff)
¿Cuándo se depositan los beneficios SNAP en Filadelfia?
En Pensilvania, los beneficios de SNAP se distribuyen entre el 1 y el 10 de cada mes, de acuerdo con el último número del caso del beneficiario.
Por ejemplo:
Si tu número de caso termina en 1, recibirás el beneficio el primer día hábil del mes.
Si termina en 2, el segundo día hábil, y así sucesivamente hasta el día 10.
El senador estatal por Pensilvania, Art Haywood, presidente del Comité de Salud y Servicios Humanos, criticó duramente los recortes impulsados por el Gobierno federal: “La dependencia de millones de residentes de Pensilvania de programas como SNAP y Medicaid no puede ignorarse. Necesitamos resistir estos recortes ahora”, declaró Haywood durante una conferencia de prensa en Harrisburg. El senador también alertó sobre el impacto económico que podría afectar a comerciantes locales, trabajadores agrícolas y tiendas de barrio que dependen de los ingresos generados por los cupones de alimentos.
“Por otro lado, Edward Bonilla, dueño de 5th Street Supermarket, entiende que, si se eliminan los beneficios, esto afecta a todos: “Este es un vecindario de bajos recursos, y la gente necesita esa ayuda porque no hay otra forma de vivir”.
¿Qué pueden hacer las familias afectadas?
Documentar las horas de trabajo para cumplir con los nuevos requisitos.
Buscar asesoría legal o comunitaria: grupos como UnidosUS, SNAP Outreach Centers y Feeding America ofrecen apoyo gratuito.
Apelar decisiones si reciben una notificación de cancelación de beneficios.
Aplicar a otros programas, como WIC, en caso de pérdida de SNAP.
Para informarse a través de fuentes oficiales como fns.usda.gov/snap.
Edward Bonilla, owner of 5th Street Supermarket, understands that this reduction will affect many. (Photo: Impacto/Staff)
Thousands of families in Philadelphia and across Pennsylvania began this month under new federal rules that affect access to essential programs like SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program). The changes, driven by new federal legislation, especially impact immigrant communities and low-income households.
Stricter rules coming for SNAP
Although SNAP benefits themselves did not change on August 1, a new federal law, known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBB), is being rolled out in phases. These new rules will be enforced gradually in every state through 2026.
Key changes to SNAP access:
Mandatory work requirement: Adults ages 18 to 64 without children or dependents must work, receive job training, or volunteer at least 80 hours per month (about 20 hours per week) to continue receiving SNAP.
Tighter exceptions for parents: Only parents with children 14 years old or younger will be exempt. Previously, the cutoff age was 18.
Stricter rules for legal immigrants: Minimum residency periods and additional documentation will be required to maintain eligibility.
Benefit reduction: The average monthly SNAP benefit is expected to decrease by about $100 per person.
When are SNAP benefits distributed in Philadelphia?
In Pennsylvania, SNAP benefits are distributed between the 1st and the 10th of each month, based on the last digit of your case number.
For example:
If your case number ends in 1, you’ll receive benefits on the first business day of the month.
If it ends in 2, on the second business day, and so on until day 10.
Senator Art Haywood, chair of the Health and Human Services Committee, strongly criticized the cuts pushed by the federal government. (Photo: Social Media)
What lawmakers and local leaders are saying
Pennsylvania State Senator Art Haywood, chair of the Senate Health and Human Services Committee, strongly criticized the federal cuts: “The dependence of millions of Pennsylvania residents on programs like SNAP and Medicaid cannot be ignored. We must fight back against these cuts now,” Haywood said during a press conference in Harrisburg.
The senator also warned of the economic impact on small businesses, farm workers, and neighborhood stores that rely on revenue from SNAP purchases.
Local businesses are concerned
Edward Bonilla, owner of 5th Street Supermarket, explained: “If the benefits are taken away, it affects everyone. This is a low-income neighborhood, and people need that help — there’s no other way to survive.”
What can affected families do?
Keep records of your work or training hours: to meet new requirements.
Seek legal or community assistance: Organizations like UnidosUS, SNAP Outreach Centers, and Feeding America provide free support.
Appeal if you receive a cancellation notice: many cases can be reviewed.
Apply for other programs: like WIC, if you lose SNAP.