14.2 C
Philadelphia
spot_img
Inicio Blog Página 633

Board of Education Continues Momentum in Final Action Meeting of 2023-24 School Year

Avian Influenza

PHILADELPHIA – This evening marked the final Action Meeting of the Philadelphia Board of Education for the 2023-2024 school year, with the Board reviewing and voting on key items including expanded learning opportunities in partnership with Mayor Cherelle L. Parker’s Administration, school-based health and mental services, professional development and curriculum coaching for school staff, and capital and facilities investments. 

The following items received unanimous approval: 

Expanded Learning Opportunities 

The Board authorized the District to continue operation of Out of School Time (OST) programs in District schools managed by qualified providers in collaboration with the City of Philadelphia’s Office of Children and Families. 

The Board also authorized the District to enter into a contract with providers to engage students in learning activities beyond the regular school day. These OST programs offer research-based approaches to enrichment, engagement, and student growth opportunities centered in student interest, social-emotional learning, skills acquisition, relationship-building, and more.

OST programs give students unique opportunities to explore their interests through activities that are aligned to academic, social-emotional, and college and career focus areas. These OST programs also promote general economic stability for families across the District by offering programs, both during the school year and in the summer, that support working schedules in a variety of ways. Finally, OST programs are critical resources for violence prevention as they allow families to ensure that their children are able to remain engaged in safe environments with caring adults beyond regular school hours.

School-Based Health Centers 

The Board authorized the District to work with service providers to provide school-based medical, dental, and behavioral healthcare services in select schools with the highest need. 

Students’ academic performance, attendance, and social-emotional and behavioral wellbeing are inextricably connected to their health and wellness. School-based wellness centers, also known as school-based health centers (SBHCs), are an evidence-based intervention to increase health and education equity and are a key component of the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD)/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)’s “Whole School, Whole Community, Whole Child” framework for promoting health and well-being in schools.

SBHCs support the Board of Education’s Goals and Guardrails by helping to ensure every school is a safe, welcoming, and healthy place where students, staff, and the community want to be and learn each day. Additionally, SBHCs partner with parents and family members to ensure they are welcomed and encouraged to be partners in their child’s school community. Lastly, SBHCs address racist practices by removing barriers to healthcare in communities of color disproportionately impacted by primary and mental health care workforce shortages and other social determinants of health, such as poverty and lack of healthcare access.

Intensive Behavioral Health Services (IBHS) 

The Board authorized the District to work with mental health services providers to include individual therapy, group therapy, care coordination, and family support. Starting with the 2020-2021 school year, Intensive Behavioral Health Services (IBHS) has been provided in every school in the District. IBHS is designed to address the needs of children by providing trauma-informed and evidence-based therapeutic interventions that support the needs of our students and families.

IBHS is delivered by licensed mental health provider agencies approved by Community Behavioral Health at no cost to the District. These mental health providers are responsible for providing behavioral health services, which include individual, family, and group therapies, case coordination, and connection with a family peer specialist. Services will be provided in the school, home, and community for each student that receives authorization for the service.

Curriculum-Based Instructional Coaching and Professional Development 

The Board authorized the District to engage vendors to provide instructional professional development and/or coaching to support K-12 curriculum implementation.

This work is connected to the District’s plan for every student to perform on or above grade level in ELA. Additionally, teachers and school leaders are the most important factor when it comes to student learning and academic growth. When educators feel supported, valued, and respected, they are more likely to stay in their roles and build strong relationships with students, which is paramount to student joy and academic achievement. Training and preparing school staff members for their roles allows our schools to prioritize high-quality teaching and learning, and cultivate environments that are supportive and nurturing to both students and staff.

Design Services for the Renovation of the Sayre Morris Recreation Center

The Board authorized the District to procure professional architectural services for the major renovation and modernization of Sayre Morris Recreation Center’s building systems and exterior.

While the School District will retain ownership of the property, the Philadelphia Parks and Recreation (PPR) department will staff the building, run all pool-related programming, and be responsible for general maintenance and upkeep of the facility.

The Board is excited for this continued collaboration with the City of Philadelphia to expand access to recreation and aquatics for our young people. 

Capital and Facilities Investments

The Board approved other capital improvement projects totaling almost $9 million, including:

Finally at tonight’s Action Meeting the Board voted on several charter school related matters. 

This included the renewal of several public charter schools including:

The Board also took action to deny a revised new charter application for Global Leadership Academy International Charter High School and adopted an Adjudication in support of the denial.

This Fall, the Board will further monitor the District’s 2023-2024 progress toward achieving its Goals and Guardrails through regularly scheduled monitoring meetings. The Board hopes the public will attend these meetings to learn more about the District’s accomplishments this school year.

“The Board of Education is immensely proud of our learners. We send a huge congratulations to all graduating students and a big thank you to our teachers, staff, and administrators for all they accomplished for our school communities” said President Streater. “As we close out this school year, this Board is already looking towards Fall when we’ll learn more about the progress made toward achieving the Board’s adopted Goals and Guardrails. The Board wishes all our students and school community members a safe and restful summer, and we will see you in the 2024-2025 school year.”

FACT CHECK: Trump Wants to Abandon Ukraine and Let Putin’s Russia “Do Whatever the Hell They Want”

EFE/EPA/MICHAEL REYNOLDS
Donald Trump will let Russia’s dictator Vladimir Putin do whatever he wants.

In one of the most reckless statements ever made by a major party’s candidate for president, Trump said he would encourage Russia to “do whatever the hell they want” to any of our NATO Allies, which would jeopardize our security, undermine America’s credibility, and make the world less safe.   As President, Trump abused his power by withholding congressionally approved aid to Ukraine to fight Russia. Now, Trump’s team is proposing a new plan to withhold military aid for Ukraine if he is elected.  

Trump has praised Putin as “smart” and “genius” for launching the war on Ukraine.     Trump said he believed he could make “a deal” where Putin could “take over” at least the “Russian-speaking areas” of Ukraine, and now behind closed doors he is supporting a policy of pushing Ukraine to surrender its sovereign territory to Putin, which would embolden dictators everywhere and make the world a more dangerous place.   As president, Trump considered recognizing Putin’s claim over Crimea, sided with Putin over the U.S. intelligence community, and tried to bring Russia back into the G7.  

Trump ordered multiple troop withdrawals that were seen as major wins for Russia, and he withdrew from international treaties aimed at keeping Russia in check.   President Biden is defending democracy around the world and has revitalized and strengthened our alliances at a critical moment. Fox: “Experts agree on Biden’s ability to stabilize traditional alliances”  

AP: “Biden proclaims NATO alliance ‘more united than ever’ in contrast to predecessor Trump”   CNN: “Biden just secured a big win from his Europe trip”   Washington Post: “Biden successfully pushed for NATO to welcome Finland, which shares an 800-mile border with Russia. It joined in April. Both Helsinki and Stockholm abandoned long-standing policies of neutrality and sought membership after Russia expanded its war in Ukraine in February 2022.”  

Politico: “Biden officials applaud Sweden’s NATO ascension, promise Ukraine a path ‘eventually’”   Military and foreign policy advisors who served under Trump criticized his leadership. Former Secretary of the Navy: “The president [Trump] has very little understanding of what it means to be in the military, to fight ethically or to be governed by a uniform set of rules and practices.”

Former U.S. Marine Corps General: “A person who admires autocrats and murderous dictators. A person that has nothing but contempt for our democratic institutions, our Constitution, and the rule of law.”   Former Trump National Security Advisor: “I mean, if Trump is elected, there will be celebrations in the Kremlin, there’s no doubt about it, because Putin thinks that he is an easy mark.”  

Former Trump Defense Secretary: Trump is not “fit for office because he puts himself first and I think anybody running for office should put the country first.”   Another Former Secretary of Defense: “Donald Trump is the first president in my lifetime who does not try to unite the American people — does not even pretend to try. Instead he tries to divide us.”

Trump y Biden comienzan el debate discutiendo sus dos visiones opuestas sobre la economía

El presidente Joe Biden (derecha) escucha mientras el candidato republicano a la presidencia, el expresidente Donald Trump habla durante el debate presidencial realizado por la cadena CNN, el jueves 27 de junio de 2024, en Atlanta. (AP Foto/Gerald Herbert)

La situación de la economía abrió el primer debate entre los candidatos a la presidencia Joe Biden y Donald Trump, que expusieron sus visiones opuestas sobre uno de los temas que más preocupa a los estadounidenses.

El presidente Biden arrancó haciendo una referencia a la situación heredada en 2021 cuando asumió la presidencia: «Lo que me dejó el señor Trump fue una economía que estaba en caída libre».

«La pandemia fue tan mal manejada que mucha gente estaba muriendo (…) La economía colapsó. No había empleos. La tasa de desempleo aumentó al 15%, fue terrible. Entonces lo que tuvimos que hacer es intentar recomponer las cosas nuevamente», afirmó el presidente.

Una visión muy distinta ofreció Trump, quien afirmó que durante su mandato (2017-2021) Estados Unidos tuvo «la mayor economía en la historia» del país.

«Nunca lo hemos hecho tan bien. Todo el mundo quedó asombrado. Otros países nos estaban copiando. Nos golpeó la covid y, cuando lo hicimos, gastamos el dinero necesario para no terminar en una Gran Depresión», dijo.

La llegada de Biden al poder, añadió fue «un desastre para nuestro país» y «los únicos empleos que creó son para inmigrantes ilegales y empleos de recuperación, una recuperación del covid».

«No ha hecho un buen trabajo. Ha hecho un mal trabajo y la inflación está matando a nuestro país. Nos está matando absolutamente», afirmó en un tono calmado, poco usual en el expresidente.

Biden no se dio por vencido y afirmó que Trump es «el único que piensa eso».

Tanto Trump como Biden son conscientes de que, según las encuestas, la economía y la inflación son dos de las principales prioridades de los votantes y los conceptos que más determinarán su voto.

Pero ambos dibujan la realidad de modo distinto. Biden, que heredó una grave crisis por la pandemia, se jacta de haber creado desde que llegó al poder más de 15 millones de puestos de trabajo, con una tasa de desempleo históricamente baja, en el 4 %.

La inflación, además, ha bajado considerablemente desde el máximo del 9,1 % que alcanzó en junio de 2022 y hoy está en el 3,3 %.

En el sombrío panorama internacional, la economía estadounidense sigue creciendo. En el primer trimestre el PIB creció cuatro décimas, a un ritmo de anual de crecimiento del 1,4 %.

Así, si se cumpliera la estadística de que ningún presidente estadounidense posterior a la Segunda Guerra Mundial (1939-1945) ha perdido unas elecciones cuando la economía es boyante, Joe Biden lo tendría todo para ganar en noviembre.

Pero, según los analistas, hoy en día existe una desconexión de estas cifras con los votantes, quienes en su mayoría creen que la economía estadounidense no va bien, especialmente por el coste de la vida.

Trump conoce, por tanto, que esta percepción le puede beneficiar y constantemente ataca al demócrata responsabilizándolo de ser el generador “de la pesadilla inflacionaria”.

Y le acusa, por ejemplo, de inventarse méritos al afirmar que el 72% de todos los empleos que Biden afirma haber creado son en realidad empleos creados tras la debacle de la pandemia.

El primer cara a cara de este año tiene lugar en los estudios de la cadena CNN en la ciudad de Atlanta (Georgia), con una duración de 90 minutos y sin presencia de público.

La cita ocurre en un momento trascendental dado que ambos candidatos están empatados en las encuestas y cualquier error que se haga viral podría decantar la balanza.

EFE/EPA/MICHAEL REYNOLDS

Biden comete varios errores verbales en debate; Trump insiste en falsedades sobre inmigración

Associated Press reporta:

El presidente estadounidense Joe Biden dio respuestas poco claras en los primeros momentos de su debate con su rival republicano, Donald Trump, quien contrarrestó las críticas de Biden con energía y a veces apoyándose en falsedades sobre la economía y la inmigración.

Biden tenía una voz áspera y se mostró vacilante al tratar de defender su trabajo en materia económica y al criticar a Trump. Biden pareció perder el hilo mientras daba una respuesta, desviándose de una respuesta sobre la política fiscal a la política de salud, en un momento dado utilizando la palabra “COVID”, y luego diciendo: “perdón, con, tratando con”, y se desvió de nuevo.

“Miren, por fin hemos vencido a Medicare”, dijo Biden, cuando se le acababa el tiempo de su respuesta.

Trump retomó el tema y dijo: “Así es, venció a Medicaid, lo mató a golpes. Y está destruyendo Medicare”.

Trump insinuó falsamente que Biden estaba debilitando el programa de servicios sociales debido a la llegada ilegal de inmigrantes al país.

El mandatario demócrata tiene la oportunidad de asegurar a los votantes que a sus 81 años es capaz de guiar a Estados Unidos en un contexto de desafíos para el país. Mientras tanto, Trump, de 78, podría aprovechar el momento para dejar atrás su sentencia de culpabilidad en Nueva York y convencer a millones de que su temperamento es adecuado para regresar al Despacho Oval.

Trump y Biden enfrentan fuertes vientos en contra, incluyendo un público cansado del tumulto de la política partidista y ampliamente insatisfecho con ambos, según las encuestas. Pero el debate puso de relieve que ambos tienen visiones muy diferentes en prácticamente todos los temas centrales —aborto, economía y política exterior— y una profunda hostilidad mutua.

Los dos candidatos subieron al escenario y se dirigieron directamente a sus atriles, evitando estrecharse la mano. Ambos se mostraron relativamente comedidos al defender su trayectoria y se culparon mutuamente de desviar al país del buen camino.

Una sobrina de Trump se encuentra en el equipo de Biden para el debate electoral

sobrina
Archivo. EFE/EPA/Alba Vigaray

Washington.- Mary Trump, sobrina del expresidente estadounidense Donald Trump (2017-2021), se encuentra en el equipo del presidente, Joe Biden, como invitada especial de la «spin room», el espacio donde el equipo del mandatario está comentando a la prensa el debate electoral.

Mary Trump una de las voces elegidas por el bando demócrata «habla de lo que está en juego en esta elección y del claro contraste sobre los temas que la definen».

Entre las cuestiones clave, fortalecer la clase media, luchar por los derechos reproductivos de todas las mujeres, proteger la democracia «y el sorprendente contraste entre el carácter de cada candidato».

El apoyo de Mary Trump al rival electoral de su tío no es sorprendente. La escritora y psicóloga, de 59 años, ha hablado públicamente en el pasado del «racismo» y la «incompetencia» de este: «Solía tener pena por él, pero luego eso me resultó imposible», dijo en una entrevista hace más de tres años.

«Toda mi vida he sido testigo del narcisismo y la crueldad de mi tío», subrayó en un comunicado difundido por la campaña de Biden.

Según recalca, «su sentido de inferioridad siempre ha impulsado sus celos y su necesidad patológica de dominar a los demás».

«Estoy esta noche en Atlanta para recordarles a todos quién es como persona y cómo gobernaría como presidente porque hay mucho en juego como para que nos equivoquemos», añadió la sobrina.

En su libro ‘Too Much and Never Enough: How My Family Created the World’s Most Dangerous Man’, publicado en 2020, ponía ya sobre la mesa los secretos de su familia y reflejaba que en esta el dinero era el único valor, las mentiras eran aceptadas y las disculpas se veían como algo propio de los débiles.

El desacuerdo entre ambos ha llegado a los tribunales. El pasado mayo un tribunal de Nueva York dio el visto bueno a que Trump denunciara a su sobrina por su rol como fuente en una investigación del diario The New York Times sobre sus finanzas.

El expresidente considera que Mary Trump violó los términos del acuerdo de confidencialidad que era parte del pacto relativo a la herencia de Fred C. Trump, padre del expresidente, fallecido en 1999.

En la «spin room» de Biden están junto a Mary Trump legisladores demócratas como el senador Raphael Warnock o el congresista Robert García, además del equipo de comunicación de la campaña.

El director de Comunicaciones de la misma, Michael Tyler, apuntó que esas personas «no sólo son algunas de las voces más efectivas y confiables en la agenda del presidente», sino que también representan su «amplia y diversa» coalición y les ayuda a garantizar que su mensaje llegue a los votantes que decidirán las elecciones del 5 de noviembre.

FACT FOCUS: Here’s a look at the false claims you might hear during tonight’s presidential debate

campaigns
This combo image shows President Joe Biden, left, Jan. 5, 2024, and Republican presidential candidate former President Donald Trump, right, Jan. 19, 2024. Biden and Trump each won the White House through razor-thin margins in key states. Now they each must try to rebuild their once-winning coalitions. (Photo: AP/ File)

To hear former President Donald Trump tell it, the U.S. has fallen apart under President Joe Biden: the economy is failing, countries are emptying their prisons and mental institutions across the southern border and crime has skyrocketed.

Biden, on the other hand, has claimed he confronted an inflation rate of 9% and $5 gas prices when he took office, and boasts about his administration’s job creation without telling the full story.

There’s no comparing the volume of false and misleading claims Trump has deployed throughout his campaigns and presidency with Biden, who tends to lean more on exaggerations and embellishments rather than outright lies. But as the two men prepare to debate Thursday night, here’s a look at the facts around false and misleading claims frequently made by the two candidates.

Economy

Trump and his team like to claim his presidency gave the U.S. its “greatest economy in history.”

That’s not accurate.

First of all, the pandemic triggered a massive recession during his presidency. The government borrowed $3.1 trillion in 2020 to stabilize the economy. Trump had the ignominy of leaving the White House with fewer jobs than when he entered.

But Trump’s team likes to argue that only his pre-pandemic economic record should be judged. So, how does that compare?

— Economic growth averaged 2.67% during Trump’s first three years. That’s pretty solid. But it’s nowhere near the 4% averaged during Bill Clinton’s two terms from 1993 to 2001, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis. In fact, growth has been stronger so far under Biden than under Trump.

Now, Trump did have the unemployment rate get as low as 3.5% before the pandemic. But again, the labor force participation rate for people 25 to 54 — the core of the U.S. working population — was higher under Clinton. The participation rate has also been higher under Biden than Trump.

Trump also likes to talk about how low inflation was under him. Gasoline fell as low as $1.77 a gallon. But, of course, that price dip happened during pandemic lockdowns when few people were driving. The low prices were due to a global health crisis, not Trump’s policies.

Similarly, average 30-year mortgage rates dipped to 2.65% during the pandemic. Those low rates were a byproduct of Federal Reserve efforts to prop up a weak economy, rather than the sign of strength that Trump now suggests it was.

— Biden has misrepresented the economy at times, including falsely claiming that gas prices were $5 when he took office. The average price was around $2.39 a gallon the week Biden was inaugurated in January 2021, according to data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration.

The president also has said in a few instances that he inherited high inflation. In May interviews, he said the inflation rate was 9% when he took office in January 2021. It was 1.4% at that point and increased steadily during the first 17 months of his presidency, reaching a peak of 9.1% in June 2022. But since then it has fallen and May data showed it at 3.3%.

His standard message has been that prices fell from their 2022 peaks without the mass layoffs and recession that many economists had predicted.

Biden correctly noted that inflation was a global phenomenon as the world economy reopened after the pandemic. He can claim that the U.S. economy is faring better than its peers. The World Bank recently estimated the U.S. economy would grow 2.6% this year, way better than the 0.7% for the 20 countries on the euro currency or 0.7% for Japan.

Yet Biden has at times boasted about his economic achievements without providing the full context. He has said his administration created a record 15 million jobs in its first three years. While data supports that, it’s partly because Biden inherited a pandemic economy. After staggering job losses early in the pandemic, the job recovery began under Trump, and continued under Biden when he took office.

Immigration

A mass influx of migrants coming into the U.S. illegally across the southern border has led to a number of false and misleading claims by Trump. For example, he regularly claims other countries are emptying their prisons and mental institutions to send to the U.S. There is no evidence to support that.

Trump has also argued the influx of immigrants is causing a crime surge in the U.S., although statistics actually show violent crime is on the way down.

There have been recent high-profile and heinous crimes allegedly committed by people in the country illegally. But FBI statistics do not separate out crimes by the immigration status of the assailant, nor is there any evidence of a spike in crime perpetrated by migrants, either along the U.S.-Mexico border or in cities seeing the greatest influx of migrants, like New York. Studies have found that people living in the country illegally are less likely than native-born Americans to have been arrested for violent, drug and property crimes.

The number of foreigners on the terrorist watch list has increased, but federal immigration authorities say they “are very uncommon” and a small fraction of the total number of migrants who cross the border. From October 2022 to September 2023, the U.S. Border Patrol reported seeing 169 people from the list, compared with 98 the previous year. Since October 2023, the Border Patrol has reported 80 encounters.

Crime

Trump falsely claims that crime has skyrocketed since he left office in 2021, particularly in Democratic-led big cities that he says are overrun with violence and bloodshed.

In reality, as Biden has accurately pointed out, violent crime is close to its lowest point in 50 years after a spike in 2020. That year, Trump’s last in office, was marred by the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and civil unrest after a Minneapolis police officer murdered George Floyd.

The FBI’s annual crime report for 2022, the last year for which yearly data is available, showed violent crime across the U.S. dropping to about the same level as before the pandemic — a rate of 380.7 violent crimes per 100,000 people compared to 380.8 per 100,000 people in 2019. Since 1972, only 2014 had a lower violent crime rate.

A quarterly FBI crime report released June 11 showed the downward trend continuing, with sharp drops in violent crime in January-March compared with the same period in 2023. According to the report, overall violent crime was down 15%, with murder and rape both down 26%, robbery down 18% and 13% fewer aggravated assaults.

Experts noted, however, that while violent crime almost certainly dropped in the first quarter, the report is preliminary, subject to revision, and is likely overstating the size of the drops.

While violent crime has trended lower, property crime has spiked — though that too may be ebbing. The 2022 report showed a 7.1% jump in property crime, such as vehicle thefts, while the quarterly report counted a 15% drop compared to the first three months of 2023.

Trump, meanwhile, contends the FBI’s statistics are skewed and don’t tell the real story. In his June 15 speech, Trump falsely claimed the statistics “no longer include data from 30% of the country including the biggest and most violent cities.”

While it’s true that some law enforcement agencies didn’t provide data to the FBI, a change in collection methods helped close the gap. The FBI said the 2022 report is based on data from 83.3% of all agencies covering 93.5% of the population. By contrast, the 2021 report contained data from 62.7% of agencies, representing 64.8% of Americans. For agencies that didn’t provide data, the FBI estimates the numbers based on comparably sized cities.

During his criminal trial in New York in April and May, Trump falsely claimed on social media that violent crime was “running rampant and totally out of control” in the city and said Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg had let violent crime “flourish at levels never seen before.”

In reality, crime in New York is nowhere near the levels seen in the early 1990s, when the city averaged more than 2,000 murders a year. Last year, according to the NYPD, there were 391 murders. This year, the city is on pace for less than 350. Shootings have dropped 41.4% since 2021, though some crimes, like reports of rape, robbery and felony assault have trended higher.

Elections

Trump’s lie that he was the real winner of the 2020 election has permeated the Republican Party and its agenda over the past four years – and the former president has shown no interest in reversing that in his current campaign.

Trump has continued using the disproven claim as fuel to motivate his supporters and sow doubt in the upcoming election results, insisting without evidence that anything but a landslide victory in 2024 would be a sign of Democrats rigging the vote.

“The radical left Democrats rigged the presidential election in 2020, and we’re not going to let them rig the presidential election in 2024,” he said at a recent campaign rally in Wisconsin.

Biden beat Trump in 2020 with 306 electoral votes to Trump’s 232 and won the popular vote by more than 7 million ballots. Legal challenges to the election were heard and roundly rejected in dozens of state and federal courts, including by judges whom Trump appointed.

And despite Trump’s allegations of foul play, members of his own administration and election administrators in his own party have maintained that election safeguards were effective and there was no evidence of widespread fraud. An exhaustive AP investigation in 2021 found fewer than 475 instances of confirmed voter fraud across six battleground states — nowhere near the magnitude required to sway the outcome of the race.

Trump and his allies have made the specter of mass numbers of noncitizens voting in the presidential election their latest rallying cry. That’s also not based in fact.

It’s a felony for non-U.S. citizens to vote in presidential elections — one that states have mechanisms to catch. Election administration experts say the number of noncitizens illegally voting in federal elections is extremely small, and audits of voter rolls in several states confirm that.

The world

Foreign affairs are likely to loom large in the debate as both Trump and Biden look to tout their leadership while criticizing the other’s handling of world affairs. Likely topics include the wars in Ukraine and Gaza, conflicts with China, Russia and Iran, as well as the strength of U.S. alliances — complicated subjects that have long been the topic of misleading, debunked and exaggerated claims.

Trump has repeatedly misled about his own administration’s support for Ukraine in the years ahead of Russia’s 2022 invasion. Trump has said that his administration gave Ukraine the $400 million that Congress had approved ahead of schedule — even though he actually held up the funding in an effort to pressure Ukraine to announce an investigation of Democrats. That incident led to Trump’s first impeachment by the U.S. House.

He has also falsely accused his predecessors of ignoring Ukraine’s pleas for military aid. “The Obama-Biden administration only sent them meals and blankets,” he said two years ago.

Trump has repeated a debunked story that Ukraine sought to intervene in the 2016 U.S. election by hacking into Democratic Party servers and then framing Russia for the attack. Authorities have said the evidence shows that Russia was behind the attack, and that suggestions that Ukraine did it are playing into the Kremlin’s hands.

“Fictions,” Trump’s former special assistant on the National Security Council, Fiona Hill, told members of Congress when asked about Trump’s assertions. “I would ask that you please not promote politically driven falsehoods that so clearly advance Russian interests.”

Biden, for his part, has misleadingly taken credit for an international group including the U.S., Australia, Japan and India known as the Quad. Last year, Biden claimed he convinced the countries to form the organization to maintain stability in the Indian Ocean and South China Sea. But the group was actually formed in the early 2000s, and revived in 2017 under Trump.

Biden y Trump se reencuentran en primer debate presidencial previo a elecciones de noviembre

debate
Sala de prensa del debate

El presidente Joe Biden y el expresidente Donald Trump buscan resaltar los éxitos de cada una de sus administraciones y los fracasos de sus contrapartes en el primer debate presidencial de CNN de cara a las elecciones de noviembre próximo en EE. UU.

WASHINGTON — Por primera vez en la historia de Estados Unidos, un mandatario en ejercicio y un expresidente del país se ven cara a cara mientras luchan por regresar a la Casa Blanca. El demócrata Joe Biden, y su antecesor, el republicano Donald Trump, se reencuentran esta noche en el primer debate presidencial de CNN previo a las elecciones de noviembre.

Biden y Trump llegaron hasta los estudios de la televisora CNN en Atlanta, Georgia, para dar inicio al intercambio, que empezó a las 9 de la noche hora local. Esta es la primera vez que ambos presidentes se encuentran desde 2020, cuando se enfrentaron en dos debates.

A diferencia de eventos anteriores, este no tiene una audiencia ni declaraciones de apertura. No se permiten accesorios ni notas escritas previamente en el escenario, únicamente un lapicero, una libreta y una botella de agua por cada participante.

Un lanzamiento de moneda determinó que Trump pronunciaría el discurso al final de los 90 minutos pautados. Bajo el mismo método, Biden pudo escoger su posición en la tarima y decidió aparecer a la derecha de los televisores

Durante el primer debate entre Trump y Biden en 2020, el expresidente republicano resaltó por sus constantes interrupciones al entonces candidato demócrata. En esta ocasión, ambos se basarán en un conjunto de reglas y condiciones mutuamente acordadas. Entre ellas, la determinación de que el micrófono de cada candidato esta silenciado, excepto cuando es su turno de hablar.

Biden y Trump tienen material de sobra para atacar a su contrincante. A Trump lo persigue la reciente declaración de culpabilidad en Nueva York por falsificación de registros comerciales y otras acusaciones en su contra, y a Biden, el cuestionamiento sobre su energía, el caso criminal contra su hijo Hunter y el manejo de temas como la inmigración, blanco de críticas desde ambos lados de la política estadounidense.

Un asunto de edad

Con 81 años, Biden se convirtió en el presidente en ejercicio de mayor edad en alcanzar la posición. Trump y sus aliados republicanos se han burlado del presidente demócrata por aparentes tropiezos relacionados con su edad. Incluso, han cuestionado si Biden puede siquiera permanecer despierto y en pie durante los 90 minutos completos del debate.

Trump, sin embargo, es apenas tres años menor que Biden, y de ganar las elecciones de este año, asumiría la posición con 78 años y la terminaría con 82 años. El expresidente ha cometido sus propios errores en mítines políticos.

Los demócratas tienen la esperanza de que Biden pueda aportar la misma energía que mostró en su discurso sobre el Estado de la Unión a principios de año, con el reto añadido de enfrentarse a un combate verbal con su mayor crítico.

Atacar al contrincante o resaltar logros personales

El debate presidencial de CNN de este jueves deja en evidencia las estrategias de cada candidato para tratar de convencer a los votantes de centro e independientes – quienes podrían decidir las elecciones-, sobre quién es la mejor opción para dirigir el país.

Aunque las críticas entre ambos son amplias, quedará por verse si Trump y Biden usarán el tiempo del debate para resaltar sus políticas o atacarse. El estado de la economía, la inmigración y los conflictos globales son temas prioritarios recientes.

Para Trump, el aborto está entre los asuntos más importante en estos comicios. Sus nombramientos en la Corte Suprema mientras era presidente favorecieron la posterior anulación de la sentencia Roe vs. Wade, lo que desencadenó una avalancha de restricciones al aborto en todo el país. El exmandatario ha reclamado el crédito en varias intervenciones.

Mientras tanto, la inmigración es uno de los temas que más resuena en la campaña de Biden. La administración demócrata ha luchado por limitar el número de inmigrantes que ingresan al país por la frontera entre Estados Unidos y México, un número que alcanzó récords históricos durante su administración.

El segundo debate presidencial entre Trump y Biden en este ciclo electoral será en septiembre, con el canal ABC News como anfitrión.

Los latinos representan casi el 71% del crecimiento general de la población de EE. UU.

Imagen de archivo de un grupo de 'charros' mexicanos en la edición 66 del Desfile Anual del Día de la Independencia de México, en el este de Los Ángeles (California, EE. UU.). (Foto: EFE/ARMANDO ARORIZO)

Los latinos representaron cerca del 71 % del crecimiento general de la población de Estados Unidos, una alza que estuvo impulsada principalmente por el mayor número de nacimientos de esta comunidad entre 2022 y 2023, según un reporte del Censo revelado este jueves.

Los nacimientos de los latinos contribuyeron significativamente al aumento de la población de esta comunidad que sumó 1,16 millones en 2023, y representa la mayoría del alza total (1,64 millones) en Estados Unidos.

Los latinos constituyen casi una quinta parte (19,5 %) de la población estadounidense, según datos de en 2023, el segundo grupo más grande después de los estadounidenses blancos no hispanos.

La población hispana «se está expandiendo a un ritmo sustancialmente más rápido que la población no hispana, principalmente debido al aumento natural, es decir, más nacimientos que muertes», dijo Kristie Wilder, una demógrafa del Censo.

Los investigadores encontraron que la población hispana creció más rápido con 1,8 % que la no hispana del país, que aumentó un 0,2 % (poco menos de medio millón).

El crecimiento más lento de la población no hispana se debió a una disminución natural donde experimentó 217.000 muertes más que nacimientos entre 2022 y 2023, explicó el informe.

No obstante, el reporte advierte que si bien los nacimientos fueron la mayor contribución al crecimiento de la población hispana entre 2022 y 2023, con aproximadamente 722.000 más que el número de muertes, los inmigrantes latinos representaron aproximadamente un tercio del aumento neto general de la población, con poco más de 437.000 inmigrantes que ingresaron al país en ese periodo.

Y aunque la población hispana siguió creciendo para llegar a un poco más de 65 millones, su crecimiento anual del 1,8 % entre 2022 y 2023 es más lento que en otros años como entre 2012 y 2013 que creció un 2,0 % y 3,7 % entre 2002 y 2003.

Lawmakers advance proposal to greatly expand Sunday hunting in Pennsylvania

proposal
Shown is the Pennsylvania House of Representatives, Feb. 4, 2014, in Harrisburg, Pa. A Democratic-sponsored proposal to boost public school funding by billions in the coming years and impose stricter rules on cyber-charter schools passed the Pennsylvania House on Monday, June 10, 2024, in a test of political will as lawmakers haggle over the coming year's state budget. (Photo: AP/Matt Rourke/File)

HARRISBURG, Pa. — Hunting on Sundays in Pennsylvania would be greatly expanded under a proposal that passed the state House on Thursday over objections about trespassing provisions and new restrictions on hunting in state parks.

Lawmakers voted 129-73 to send the bill to the state Senate.

“Sunday is an opportunity to educate our children about the great American tradition of protecting wild places and the deep connection to the land that comes through responsible and respectful hunting,” said Democratic Rep. Mandy Steele of Allegheny County, the bill’s prime sponsor.

She said an exploding deer population was causing farmers’ crop losses and the change would encourage people to connect with the land.

Berks County Republican Rep. David Maloney said the trespassing language concerned him, the proposal would require game wardens to work Sundays and that eliminating hunting at state parks was not an improvement.

“We have 124 state parks, and 100 of them already are permissible for hunting,” Maloney said. “But we’re going to exclude the state parks? This is why I don’t think you can make a bad bill better by doing certain amendments.”

It would authorize Sunday hunting for about five years. Current law allows three days of Sunday hunting: a day during rifle deer season, a day during archery deer season and a third day at the Game Commission’s discretion. The three days a year law was enacted nearly five years ago.

Pennsylvania is among 12 states that do not generally allow hunting for deer, bear and turkey on Sundays. The state’s prohibition on Sunday hunting dates to the 19th century, although there are exceptions for crows, foxes and coyotes, and for noncommercial private game reserves.

Pennsylvania Senate passes bill to bar universities and pension funds from divesting from Israel

Pennsylvania
People walk past the Gaza Solidarity Encampment at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, Tuesday, April 30, 2024. In the wake of pro-Palestinian protesters on college campuses calling for universities to divest from Israel, Pennsylvania’s state Senate on Thursday, June 27, 2024, approved legislation that would block state aid from going to any university that boycotts or divests from Israel. (Photo: AP/Monica Herndon/The Philadelphia Inquirer/File)

HARRISBURG, Pa. — Pennsylvania’s state Senate approved legislation Thursday that would block state aid from going to any university that boycotts or divests from Israel, following pro-Palestinian protests on college campuses across the country that included demands for divestment.

The measure, which passed by a vote of 41 to 7, also would bar the state treasurer and public pension systems from boycotting or divesting from Israel’s government or commercial financial activity in that country.

The bill won support from all but one Republican and most Democrats. It now goes to the House.

Supporters of the legislation said it was motivated by a desire to support an ally nation in its war with Hamas, to fight a rising tide of antisemitism in the United States and to alert state-subsidized universities that they must protect Jewish students from threats and bullying by anti-Israel protesters.

The bill was opposed by some of the Senate’s more liberal members, including Democrat Art Haywood, who said he was concerned that it would restrict free speech.

Fellow Democratic Sen. Steve Santarsiero, who was a sponsor, disputed that the bill infringes on freedom of speech and said students and faculty will still be able to protest peacefully.

The bill does not punish universities that make investment decisions to fulfill their fiduciary responsibility to maximize returns, and it has has no impact on personal college investment accounts or student loans, Santarsiero said.

Another supporter, Democratic Sen. Judy Schwank, said she hopes it sends a message to college administrators and boards of trustees that are responsible for campus safety.

“Bodily harm, death threats, go beyond just hurt feelings and they certainly stretch the limits of free speech,” Schwank said.

Pennsylvania sends more than $2 billion annually to institutions of higher education through direct appropriations and student grants. Much of it goes to the system of 10 state-owned universities, along with Penn State, Temple University, Lincoln University, the University of Pittsburgh and the University of Pennsylvania.

Demonstrators at campuses across the country have sparred over the Israel-Hamas war this year.

To end encampments without using police force, some schools negotiated with protesters over their divestment demands: Rutgers, in New Jersey, agreed to discuss severing business ties with Israel, while Illinois’ Northwestern revived a committee on “investment responsibility.”

No Pennsylvania schools that receive state aid reported that they had agreed to protesters’ demands to divest from Israel.

Encampments at the University of Pennsylvania and at Drexel University in Philadelphia ended after the schools called in police.

Liz Magill, Penn’s president, resigned in December amid pressure from donors and criticism over testimony at a congressional hearing where she was unable to say under repeated questioning that calls on campus for the genocide of Jews would violate the school’s conduct policy.

Trump llega a Atlanta en su avión privado para su primer debate con Biden

trump
El expresidente de Estados Unidos Donald Trump (2017-2021). (Foto: EFE/Kham/Archivo)

Atlanta, EE. UU.– El expresidente de Estados Unidos Donald Trump (2017-2021) llegó este jueves a Atlanta (Georgia) a bordo de su avión privado para participar en el primer debate de cara a las elecciones de noviembre con su rival, el mandatario demócrata Joe Biden.

Su avión, que la campaña llama ‘Trump Force One’ en referencia al nombre del avión presidencial ‘Air Force One’, aterrizó sobre las 17.20 hora local (21.20 GMT) en el Aeropuerto Internacional Hartsfield-Jackson, el principal aeródromo de la ciudad de Atlanta.

En la pista le esperaba un grupo de seguidores, ondeando alguna bandera estadounidense y móvil en mano para grabar el momento.

Trump llegó acompañado por algunos de sus principales asesores de campaña, incluyendo al consultor político Chris LaCivita y Jason Miller, quien ya trabajó con el magnate en las campañas de 2016 y 2020 y quien ha dirigido la preparación para el debate de este jueves por la noche, informaron varias fuentes a la CNN.

Según la cadena, Miller ha revisado horas de debates en los que ha participado Biden, incluyendo los dos que tuvo con Trump en 2020, así como actuaciones anteriores.

Algunos de los nombres que suenan como posibles compañeros de fórmula de Trump para ocupar la Vicepresidencia ya se encuentran en Atlanta y han estado dando entrevistas a los medios.

Varios de ellos, como el senador afroamericano de Carolina del Sur Tim Scott y la legisladora republicana Elise Stefanik, estarán presentes tras el debate en la «spin room», el espacio donde el equipo del exmandatario comentará a la prensa el cara a cara de este jueves.

El debate, el primero entre los dos candidatos para las elecciones del 5 de noviembre, se llevará a cabo en los estudios de la CNN en Atlanta, durará 90 minutos y no contará con público.

Tendrá la particularidad de que la cadena cortará el micrófono a los candidatos cuando se les acabe el tiempo para hablar o no sea su turno, con el objetivo de evitar las interrupciones constantes que marcaron los dos tensos debates de Trump y Biden en 2020.